Dillingham is the guy I would bet on becoming a 25+ PPG scorer so that’s why I would just take him. He’d clearly be BPA imo.Yeah I'd consider them and Dilly/Topic. I need to watch Topic more. I wish he had played in the upper league longer.
Dillingham is the guy I would bet on becoming a 25+ PPG scorer so that’s why I would just take him. He’d clearly be BPA imo.Yeah I'd consider them and Dilly/Topic. I need to watch Topic more. I wish he had played in the upper league longer.
If his shot is iffy and he is a bad defender (as all the reports state) then being 6'6 doesn't make him super fungible does it?Topic can fit next to a ton of players. He isn't comparable to Dilingham
You can say that about any position player at 10.....
It does.If his shot is iffy and he is a bad defender (as all the reports state) then being 6'6 doesn't make him super fungible does it?
If his shot is iffy and he is a bad defender (as all the reports state) then being 6'6 doesn't make him super fungible does it?
It doesn’tIt does.
Yeah, it's tough to be 6'6 in the NBA, especially when you have a 7' wingspanIt doesn’t
And I think the ft shooting was good and his shot form isn’t broken so there are some solid indicators. I need to watch him more to see if I think it will translate. At 10 it’s likely he’s BPA… but I’d be looking at Carter and wonder if it was a mistake.What Topic *can* do is beat defenders off the dribble, get to the rim at a high rate and drill passes all over the court. He's easily the best pure playmaker in the draft, imo. Meanwhile, the Jazz might be the most limited playmaking team in the league.
Size alone does not make a player flexible. If he can’t shoot and sucks at defense he may be a tough fit. He’d have to ba an awesome ball in hand guy… which he might be.Yeah, it's tough to be 6'6 in the NBA, especially when you have a 7' wingspan