So if NY didn't want Shumpert, they can get Taveres and Frye instead:
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ycr85tmo
Cleveland would probably give up another pick in the future if they got to get Favors, Melo while keeping Shumpert. The Cavs would be stacked....
I think this is too rich for the Cavs. They are in the repeater tax and that is adding a ton of money on the books when they have signaled some desire to shed salary. Plus Favors makes no sense with TT in place. Redundant skill sets, they need perimeter defenders who can also shoot.
I still think a 4-way trade like this makes more sense (while ofc the likelihood of anything happening are small in 4-way trades): http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y92w8dt2
Cavs get depth and perimeter defenders they need to contend with GSW. They do add salary which contradicts what I said earlier, but I think it's less than your trades.
NYK gets Favors to pair with Melo (all 3 of the other dudes are non-guaranteed). I think they would also get a pick from Utah?
Houston gets the star power they desire with Melo. I also threw in Shumpert to make up for the loss of Ariza.
Utah gets Love.
I agree to a certain extent. But then again, this might be the last hurrah to make LBJ happy before he could go to LA. Cavs have to go all in.
Also, I think LBJ would be pissed if Cleveland helped Houston get his buddy to Houston instead of with him at Cleveland. It would have been like helping OKC land Paul George and hoping Hayward is still happy here.
Klay.
I think LBJ would be pissed if Cleveland helped Houston get his buddy Melo instead of just bringing him to Cleveland.
Love to Utah
Melo to Cleveland
Favors, Diaw and our 2018 1st to NY
I would bet LBJ would rather have Melo than Love
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
[TWEET]885537132311265281[/TWEET]
https://twitter.com/tribjazz/status/885537132311265281