What's new
By:

A bit of trade speculation surrounding Cousins...

kabenac said:
Some posters freak out when someone posts about D-Will returning and what it will do to team morale. Cousins is the worst cancer out there. His attitude sucks, he's fought teammates in the past (college, NBA), pulled Thomas away from Chris Paul during a post-game handshake, etc. Hell, no.
Click to expand...
Blasphemy! Kanter is the worst - it's a fact which anyone on JF can confirm.
 
jope said:
FWIW, both of those guys won chips... I might be in the minority, but I think i would still actually trade favors for cuz...
Click to expand...

I think a lot of Cousins issues are because hes on a **** team with retard players around him. That has to be very frustrating.
 
Jamezz said:
This one makes me harder than overdosing on Viagra:

https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=lon9ux3
Click to expand...


Maybe an over-share? Dunno. I'm not that high on Giannis, tbh. Great length defensively, but so far his unique traits haven't translated to in-game dominance as a wing or a forward. Hayward has excellent mobility, IQ and ability to facilitate for an SF. He's still a glue guy of sorts, but one of the best in the league.
 
One important factor that someone mentioned, the Kings have to bring in a replacement for Cousins--a high-caliber player--who won't throw a fit for being traded to what will likely be the worst team in the league next year. The Kings without Cousins have a record like 5-24 or something.

Could you imagine Blake Griffin and KIA's reaction if Blake were traded to Sacramento? How about Russell Westbrook? Sacto almost has to trade Cousins for a lottery pick and completely start over. Without Cousins, that franchise literally has nothing above replacement value---well, depending on how you feel about Ben McLemore.
 
Jamezz said:
Giannis' offense will come around I have no doubt about it. We're talking about enlarging the 'development era' into a team with better potential even than what we currently have. Adding Giannis to this group would be huge man, I don't know what you're talking about.

Currently I put Giannis' potential at A and Hayward's at B- being generous. Plus Exum will start coming around as well and Favors and Gobert still have some wiggle room to improve on offense.
Take the Gordo blinders off...
Click to expand...

Huh. So Borderline All Star is a B-? Yikes. That's crazy. At worst, Hayward's potential is a B+ and he is already a...B+. So, you'd trade Hayward, a B+, for a C level player with A potential?

No thanks.

Then, you'd take a team on pace to win 55 wins and blow that up so one day you might win 60 games? When that 55 win team has the same shot at some day winning 60+ games if Exum pans out? That's crazy. That's an easy way to not make money as an owner. Instead of winning 55 next year and possibly 60 the next, you'd rather be in the lottery again next year, maybe win 55 games in three years and maybe win 60 in four years? You'd trade 19 and 5 for 12 and 6 hoping he someday hits 16 and 7?

Um. No thanks.
 
Catchall said:
Okay, now what if Sacramento is willing to trade first-round picks this year, meaning the Jazz could get Russell or Hezonja at #6. The Jazz might send out Hood and take back Stauskas or something.

That's just speculation on top of speculation... but now you're looking at Exum/Hezonja/Hayward/Cousins/Gobert, which is championship-level talent.
Click to expand...

Seriously? Please no more Stauskas trades. Cousins is a great talent but there is no way I want him on the Jazz. I like the team chemistry we have and there is no way I would throw in Hood.
 
green said:
Huh. So Borderline All Star is a B-? Yikes. That's crazy. At worst, Hayward's potential is a B+ and he is already a...B+. So, you'd trade Hayward, a B+, for a C level player with A potential?

No thanks.

Then, you'd take a team on pace to win 55 wins and blow that up so one day you might win 60 games? When that 55 win team has the same shot at some day winning 60+ games if Exum pans out? That's crazy. That's an easy way to not make money as an owner. Instead of winning 55 next year and possibly 60 the next, you'd rather be in the lottery again next year, maybe win 55 games in three years and maybe win 60 in four years? You'd trade 19 and 5 for 12 and 6 hoping he someday hits 16 and 7?

Um. No thanks.
Click to expand...

What 55 win team you are talking about? If the Jazz are making the playoffs next year is a huge question.
 
Sirkickyass said:
Cousins would immediately become the best player on our team by a fair margin. It also appears he is pleasable given how he dealt with Mike Malone. I would 100% make sure he's down to come here before trading for him though. It's probably likely he wouldn't want to share with Gobert and they both want to operate in the same space. There's a fair chance of recreating a Gasol/Noah problem.
Click to expand...

Nice of someone to come in and drop something that isn't ham-fisted stupidity.
 
green said:
Huh. So Borderline All Star is a B-? Yikes. That's crazy. At worst, Hayward's potential is a B+ and he is already a...B+. So, you'd trade Hayward, a B+, for a C level player with A potential?

No thanks.

Then, you'd take a team on pace to win 55 wins and blow that up so one day you might win 60 games? When that 55 win team has the same shot at some day winning 60+ games if Exum pans out? That's crazy. That's an easy way to not make money as an owner. Instead of winning 55 next year and possibly 60 the next, you'd rather be in the lottery again next year, maybe win 55 games in three years and maybe win 60 in four years? You'd trade 19 and 5 for 12 and 6 hoping he someday hits 16 and 7?

Um. No thanks.
Click to expand...

I would take Giannis over Hayward that's all I can say man
 
I have personally known Cousins for 6 years now.
He is a great dude. Funny as hell.

It drives me CRAZY how he pouts about EVERY call EVERY game.

But he is not a thug or a malcontent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top