What's new

A Place for Conservatives

Let's not forget, Fox News is the highest rated television news source. So this idea that all of the U.S. is getting fed lies from liberal "fake news" media is simply incorrect. No political side has a corner on news coverage. One way or another all bias is being represented in our news media.
Fox News is the highest rated cable news source with about 2.5 million prime time nightly viewers. In comparison, network news programs still average far more viewers. CBS, NBC and ABC each have between 6 and 9 million viewers to their nightly prime time news. Fox News influence far outweighs the relatively small number of people that actually watch on a nightly basis.
 
How convenient of the climate alarmists to divorce themselves from Gore at this point. When he said these things, which really aren't that difficult to remember because they were so extreme and alarmist, the leftists were praising him for taking the point position in saving the planet. I don't recall a peep from the scientists whose research he was citing explaining that he may have overstated their predictions. Nobody in that camp seems to care if a proponent of climate change overstates the case, even if their proposed solutions are ridiculous and would result in the collapse of our economy, but if someone suggests that it might not be as bad as predicted, or God forbid that CO2 might have positive impacts as well, they go bananas.

It won't surprise me if a decade from now the most vociferous proponents of climate change will be divorcing themselves from the current cadre of politicians who are trying to use this "emergency" to advance their careers and jumping on the bandwagon of a new generation of alarmists. Of course, none of them will acknowledge the obvious parallels to Chicken Little.

Yeah, I guess there's some truth to your description of what amounts to human nature when it comes to "distancing", but I can't even remember the movie, so whatever was said there, or in his book, which I did not read, are in fact difficult for me to remember. I remember attending a showing with friends, and that's about it. I remember the friends I saw his movie with, the movie, I remember ice, and polar bears. I can't speak for the scientists. At this moment in time, both their recent assessments certainly conveyed urgency. I take them seriously. You don't.

I get the alarm, if a climate change skeptic is jaw dropped at the prospect of collapsing the economy over something that does not even exist. That would rank as an epic human failure, historic failure.

Or the UN and Trump administration assessments might be accurate.

As for the Green New Deal, AOC is a kid, she's idealistic, ambitious, driven. The scientists are stressing the urgency of the situation. The saying "something's gotta give" will probably apply here. We have a president who's on your side: "I don't believe it". Remember, he said science was all but in his genes, so he should know, right? I should be happy he's leading all the skeptic's, right? But the future might judge him a bit more harshly then the climate skeptics do, and it won't have anything to do with Russia or hush funds.

Something's gotta give. I wish I were 20, I want to see the future, regardless of what it will bring. But,I have a different prediction to yours. I foresee a time where climate skeptics find themselves saying "oh ****".
 
Let's not forget, Fox News is the highest rated television news source. So this idea that all of the U.S. is getting fed lies from liberal "fake news" media is simply incorrect. No political side has a corner on news coverage. One way or another all bias is being represented in our news media.


How you just gonna throw out Fox news ratings and act like that means something when 95% of every other news source is left leaning. Common sense is add that **** all together and then compare to Fox' numbers. Of course Fox's number will be high if its the only place people on the right have to go.

You are never going to convince anyone with a brain there isnt a giant liberal news bias out there that dwarfs anything the right has.

You think there isnt a left leaning news bias because of just how much and how bad it is. You think its just normal news. Of course it would seem that way when there is hardly nothing out there to juxtapose it to.
 
How you just gonna throw out Fox news ratings and act like that means something when 95% of every other news source is left leaning. Common sense is add that **** all together and then compare to Fox' numbers. Of course Fox's number will be high if its the only place people on the right have to go.

You are never going to convince anyone with a brain there isnt a giant liberal news bias out there that dwarfs anything the right has.

You think there isnt a left leaning news bias because of just how much and how bad it is. You think its just normal news. Of course it would seem that way when there is hardly nothing out there to juxtapose it to.
I have never claimed there is NO bias in news. In fact I have acknowledged it many times. Who are you arguing against? It ain't me.
 
How you just gonna throw out Fox news ratings and act like that means something when 95% of every other news source is left leaning. Common sense is add that **** all together and then compare to Fox' numbers. Of course Fox's number will be high if its the only place people on the right have to go.

You are never going to convince anyone with a brain there isnt a giant liberal news bias out there that dwarfs anything the right has.

You think there isnt a left leaning news bias because of just how much and how bad it is. You think its just normal news. Of course it would seem that way when there is hardly nothing out there to juxtapose it to.
Next time just type "I'm a moron, possibly illiterate." Instead.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
 
Next time just type "I'm a moron, possibly illiterate." Instead.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
If you really knew what was safe for you, you would delete that post. People getting destroyed by me right and left right now.
 
"Since May 2017, 533,074 web articles have been published about Russia and Trump/Mueller, generating 245 million interactions — including likes, comments and shares — on Twitter and Facebook, according to data from social-media analytics company NewsWhip.

Quick take: Now, think of how much cable time the coverage consumed."

https://www.axios.com/robert-muelle...ach-0586790d-711f-42fe-b3e1-21acc54cdfa6.html

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...-nets-gave-whopping-2284-minutes-russia-probe

https://news.grabien.com/story-flashback-dems-media-predict-mueller-probe-results-impeachme

All of this over a fake dossier used to get warrants to spy on Trump and his campaign and family. Such a waste of time and money.
 
"Since May 2017, 533,074 web articles have been published about Russia and Trump/Mueller, generating 245 million interactions — including likes, comments and shares — on Twitter and Facebook, according to data from social-media analytics company NewsWhip.

Quick take: Now, think of how much cable time the coverage consumed."

https://www.axios.com/robert-muelle...ach-0586790d-711f-42fe-b3e1-21acc54cdfa6.html

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...-nets-gave-whopping-2284-minutes-russia-probe

https://news.grabien.com/story-flashback-dems-media-predict-mueller-probe-results-impeachme

All of this over a fake dossier used to get warrants to spy on Trump and his campaign and family. Such a waste of time and money.
You're forgetting all the actual indictments that came out of it...
 
Back
Top