A trade is brewing...

[Sexual Favors]

Burke and 23 wouldn't do it. Favors posted the best PER on the team this year, and he is the only one on a multi year non rookie scale deal (and it's at a steal!), so they'd want Favors, 23, and probably Burke as well. Would you do that?

 

[Stifle Tower]

Burke and 23 wouldn't do it. Favors posted the best PER on the team this year, and he is the only one on a multi year non rookie scale deal (and it's at a steal!), so they'd want Favors, 23, and probably Burke as well. Would you do that?

If we had a top-4 pick + theirs ended up #6/#7, yes.
Burke is not a franchise PG and Favors is not a franchise PF/C. They're expendable.

 

[Deleted member 365]

Favors, Burke, and the #23 for the Lakers' pick?

Whoa!

Is Jerry West our GM now?

All of that for... Randle, Gordon, or Vonleh?

I'm not sure if it's worth it

 

[Stifle Tower]

Favors, Burke, and the #23 for the Lakers' pick?

Whoa!

Is Jerry West our GM now?

All of that for... Randle, Gordon, or Vonleh?

WE have depth, but not stars. It's a lot to give up, obviously taking a swing for the fences.

Embiid
Vonleh
Hayward
Burks
FA PG (or trade)/Neto
(I would try to trade Kanter for a PG + other assets).

Alternately, draft Exum, Wiggins or Parker depending on where the pick falls. And then there are different trade scenarios to fill the hole the Jazz would have at one position.

I just don't see Favors as an all-star PF/C or Burke as anything but a mid-tier PG.

 

[fishonjazz]

Favors, Burke, and the #23 for the Lakers' pick?

Whoa!

Is Jerry West our GM now?

All of that for... Randle, Gordon, or Vonleh?

I'm not sure if it's worth it

Ya, its too much.

I would do one player and the pick but not two players and the pick.

If they want more than favors and 23 then **** em

 

[orangello]

The "veteran" talk is quickly shot down once you ask people to start naming names. There are players in this draft that could be all stars at 23. I'm not trading it for someone like Thaddeus Young.

Yep

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk

 

[orangello]

Anyone think we could get the Lakers pick? It mentions that they want a mid to late 1st rounder. Would you want their pick?

https://bleacherreport.com/articles...g-to-trade-lakers-lottery-pick-for-good-offer

Yes. Trade Trey while his value is high.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk

 

[orangello]

#23 and Burke for #6?

If I'm Utah I'd do that. If I'm the Lakers I want more.

You might need to throw in a future first.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk

 

[orangello]

#6 pick in this years draft

Technically they have to make the pick and then trade the player.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk

 

[sgjazzfan]

Ya, its too much.

I would do one player and the pick but not two players and the pick.

If they want more than favors and 23 then **** em

Kanter, Burke and #23 for #6 and next years first? Draft Exum/Vonleh, Smart/Randle, Gordon/Embiid, Parker/Smart. Tons of possibilites 2 top 7 picks.

 

[fishonjazz]

Kanter, Burke and #23 for #6 and next years first? Draft Exum/Vonleh, Smart/Randle, Gordon/Embiid, Parker/Smart. Tons of possibilites 2 top 7 picks.

I think that is a pretty fair trade for both teams.

Wish we really knew what we had in kanter but getting extra wins this past season was just too critical

 

[Deleted member 848]

Only way I'm trading Favors is for a top 4 pick. Dude is 22, athletically-gifted, not injury prone, and he's improved every year. Package him with Burke and another 1st rounder? Ridiculous.