idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
Sure why not. Put it on the 2020 ballot and watch the pro and anti groups vote against it lol
LMAO. Simply one of the funniest things ever written here.
Sure why not. Put it on the 2020 ballot and watch the pro and anti groups vote against it lol
At what points does the right of person A to live overrule the right of Person B to decide who can make use of person B's body? Does this only happen when A is a fetus and B is a woman?
This. And it seems obvious to me.Better for potential mothers to have the definitive say on the issue than to others to have it. That's the way I see it.
Trying to think of another example of when this would apply. Conjoined Twins? If I was attached to my twin could I kill him or her since they are making use of my body? I'm not trying to make a point, necessarily, just trying to think of something comparable.
While I'm sure we agree morally, what's the legal resolution? If twin A can live independently, and twin B has to stay attached or die, should the government force twin A to maintain the connection?
It’s still different as most likely twin B has a voice to use in the matter where an unborn child/fetus does not.
There is no good comparison worth debating.
So tbh, I’m confused as to what you’re after or seeking.
I'm asking if the government should take the decision out of the hands of twin A. Does that decision depend upon twin B, for you? Let's say twin B says he does not want to be disconnected, in very certain terms. Should we then force A to stay connected against their will?
Trying to think of another example of when this would apply. Conjoined Twins? If I was attached to my twin could I kill him or her since they are making use of my body? I'm not trying to make a point, necessarily, just trying to think of something comparable.
Is twin A’s life endangered? You're talking about willful manslaughter. Sure it ****ing sucks for A. But life ****ing sucks