What's new

Addressing our deficit at power forward

Like I said in the above post, DM's numbers were actually better with Rudy off the floor. Do you think him playing better was because of Ed/Jeff/Bradley? No, it was because with Rudy off the floor, we are allowed to play a more offensive style of basketball with a lot more space/ball movement. So yes, I do believe we could get better if we have someone like Morris or Millsap because 1, they can actually bring values at the 4 as opposed to Royce, who's more of a wing/perimeter defender and relied heavily on Rudy on both ends
2, their skills on offensive would allow us to play at a different style/pace.

Even in the W last night we got owned in O boards because whenever Rudy goes out to contest, we absolutely had nobody who could box out/cover behind him and secure those boards for us. Just imagine us not catching fire from deep the way we did and Clips hit some of those easy shots that they used to, it'd be a easy L simply because they've got a much larger margin for error.
You’re cherrypicking stats and scenarios
 
I like Conley, but with the addition of Clarkson and rise of Mudiay, if there is any way to swap out Conley for someone of equal ability at the 4, who can also backup at the 5 if necessary, I would consider doing this. Swapping Conley for a bench 4 or 5 doesn't thrill me (but might consider if getting good picks too). Maybe Clarkson or Mudiay for a backup big. Props to Oneale on getting 9 boards last night. If he is going to be the 4 though, I'd like him taking more 3s, to exploit weakness of bigger opponents.
 
Did you forget which account you’re signed into?
When you answer my question I'll answer yours. The post you referenced made a reasoned and evidenced case, and you pull some trite rebuttal out of your buttt that appears to be based nothing. I'm just wondering if what you say is based on anything at all, because it looks like it is not.
 
Last edited:
When you answer my question I'll answer yours. The post made made a very reasoned and evidenced case, and you pull some trite rebuttal out of your buttt that appears to be based nothing. I'm just wondering if what you say is based on anything at all, because it looks like it is not.
Exactly what dumb003 would say. @Mods, investigation of alt is obviously necessary.
 
Back
Top