Almost half of male managers are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman

[Ferguson_Mellochill]

Certain industries like movies, television, advertising and some others have had cultures where promiscuity is common and part of the normal culture. By this, I mean both men and women taking liberties. Maybe this is changing. As a manager, I'm keen to be careful about who I hire, whether men or women.

 

[DutchJazzer]

jordan peterson wondered aloud in a vice interview. whether men and women should work together.

even suggested maybe they shouldn't wear make up or heels. because those accentuate evolutionary sexual signs. like high heels accentuate the buttocks. and how make up makes the face red. which is also a sexual sign of fertility. but hey he got crucified for it.

he wondered whether we should have that discussion

 

[Siro]

jordan peterson wondered aloud in a vice interview. whether men and women should work together.

even suggested maybe they shouldn't wear make up or heels. because those accentuate evolutionary sexual signs. like high heels accentuate the buttocks. and how make up makes the face red. which is also a sexual sign of fertility. but hey he got crucified for it.

he wondered whether we should have that discussion

Like Saudi Arabia then. Sounds like a a smart person right there.

 

[DutchJazzer]

Like Saudi Arabia then. Sounds like a a smart person right there.

he only said we need to have the discussion. after all to er is human.

if a woman sends out "sexual signals" whether willingly or not, maybe she is sending it to someone else, or maybe she is not aware she is sending them out.
should men be chastised for sending out their own sexual signal. these discussions need to be had

 

[Siro]

he only said we need to have the discussion. after all to er is human.

if a woman sends out "sexual signals" whether willingly or not, maybe she is sending it to someone else, or maybe she is not aware she is sending them out.
should men be chastised for sending out their own sexual signal. these discussions need to be had

Someone wanting to look good doesn't mean they want to be harassed. Are you from the 1300s?

 

[DutchJazzer]

Someone wanting to look good doesn't mean they want to be harassed. Are you from the 1300s?

looking good and sending sexual signals are different things from a science perspective(evolutionary biology, psychology etc.) i thought the left was the side of science. and yet another ad hominem. your post are filled with ad hominems

 

[Siro]

looking good and sending sexual signals are different things from a science perspective(evolutionary biology, psychology etc.) i thought the left was the side of science. and yet another ad hominem. your post are filled with ad hominems

You don't know anything about science. So arguments might work when you're talking to the infant-level intellects of r/The Donald, not here. Human psychology doesn't tell you that someone wearing make up wants to be harassed. I've never had a problem with that concept. Why do you?

 

[moevillini]

Also

75% of male managers are completely inept. A recent joint study by the New England Journal of Modern Anthropological studies and the Peter Smith Center for Economic Research found that 3 out of 4 male managers could be replaced by a paper weight and it would have a positive effect on both earnings and production.

In response to the study Dale "Big" Johnson, a middle manager at the Misogyny Corporation, said "Preciate, ya! Daps?"

well that only makes sense really, if you think about it.
(you don't even have to think very hard)

After all, a paperweight isn't going to collect a salary so of course that would be a positive for corporate earnings - and it's certainly not going to create more work for anyone or come up with any hair-brained projects that prove to be a waste of time, so production will improve.

 

[♪alt13]

well that only makes sense really, if you think about it.
(you don't even have to think very hard)

After all, a paperweight isn't going to collect a salary so of course that would be a positive for corporate earnings - and it's certainly not going to create more work for anyone or come up with any hair-brained projects that prove to be a waste of time, so production will improve.

Yes but there would be a sharp decrease in daps. Everything comes with a cost.

 

[DutchJazzer]

You don't know anything about science. So arguments might work when you're talking to the infant-level intellects of r/The Donald, not here. Human psychology doesn't tell you that someone wearing make up wants to be harassed. I've never had a problem with that concept. Why do you?

are you sure. maybe you should talk to an evolutionary biologist

 

[Scat]

Human psychology doesn't tell you that someone wearing make up wants to be harassed.

Certainly not harassed. Nobody wants to be harassed. They want to wear makeup to be viewed as attractive based on society's definition. You make yourself attractive, you draw attention, wanted or not but it gets one a foot forward. Sadly, being attractive is sometimes the only way to move forward. That said, do you think attractive people would give it up to avoid unwanted attention?