D
Deleted member 848
Guest
But Yiannopoulos does it to get people worked up, right? Progressive go CRAZY when someone suggests something as innocuous as questioning the common wisdom of the wage gap.
The liberal establishment bubble does.
So Yiannopoulos takes advantage of that by kicking it up a notch. I've listened to/read a lot of his **** first hand, and once you know how to filter out the trolling and the ego, you can find some insights in the pile of garbage. I also think the media's characterization of Milo and other "alt-right" figures is kind of a useless narrative between good and evil.
Dude went to rallies with the intention of doxxing people, or getting them evicted. I'm sorry, that's a ****-stain move. I don't care to absolve people with evil messages just because they may have nailed a thing or two (Hitler is the easy example here).
Does Yiannopoulos or Maher want society to restrict the rights of any of its citizens? Not really.
Well they use language and empower movements that do, so in effect it's the same.
They're both, understandably, weary of the how mainstream progressivism morphed into a movement that attempts to dictate what is acceptable for people to say or think. Maher is more serious, but Milo is a troll who simply sees how angry people get when you attack their worldviews, so he made a career out of it.
Bill Maher is weary of the "non-issue" that is the politically-correct era, because much of his lame comedy relies on saying things that are no longer okay to say. He is textbook-deffiniton out of touch.