What's new

America is great and everything is NOT Pres. Trump's fault thread

got any other source

I don't need one. While every newspaper makes errors, the percentage of time the Times makes an error about these items is small enough that the report is reliable.

Mistreatment of women, homosexuals, and the trans-gendered is not a specifically Islamic thing. It is performed by Jews, Christians, Hindu, Buddhists, Shinto, every other religion, and by people with no religion. It's a male thing (or more properly, a patriarchy thing).
 
The New York Times is not anywhere close to failing. Just another lie Trump supporters eat up. Its stock price has doubled since Trump took office and it continues to show healthy quarterly earnings. Furthermore, it currently has 4 million subscribers (most of any US daily newspaper and more than anytime in its history), and more than 3 million of those are digital which bodes well for future growth.
 
This will lead to a CIVIL war.

let me give you an example of the netherlands.
in the netherlands we have this holiday 5th of december. where a guy dresses up as a saint. and has these people called black pete following him around
these people are in blackface. i know offensive. do i agree with the holidaty, i dont know.
because opponents say those people in blackface are supposed to be slaves. proponents say no those people help the saint deliver present through a chimney so that is why they are covered in soot. i dont know the TRUE REAL HISTORY of it. because either side could be lying. anyway lets assume the worse it is a celebration of slavery old rich white man having these slaves! SO THIS IS WRONG to celebrate. (my personal opinion even if it is wrong to celebrate THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO).
udaxvm8ap9yy_wd640.jpeg

so now for years the debate has been ban the blackface part. and they kinda did. at least government sponsored celebrations have now called them roughly translated "colourfull pete" so instead of blackface these guys now have different color faces except balck. some with decorations

gekleurde-pieten-800x500.jpg

so there you have it. the dutch have been welcoming to different cultures now they have to give up a part of their tradition!

then now look at it from the other side,. the dutch have different rules and laws for slaughter and raising of farm animals! by law. ritual slaughter is actually forbidden. because according to dutch law the animal has to be slaughtered humanly. that involves if i am not mistaken anesthetics(painkiller or sleeping thingy) and the animal is supposed to be killed with a bolt to the brain.I honestly dont know the exact law, but what i do know the way islamic/halal slaughter goes it is against that law. yet the islamic people claim it is their culture so **** your law, and the law agrees. it is your culture so **** us!
wether you agree with the law or not! but there are 2 different laws. the law is supposed to be equal wether you a dutchie or a islamist! cant have different sets of laws.

another example is you can blaspheme of christianity and judaism, but dont you dare blaspheme against islam you will litterally get fined and in some cases jailed

this keeps escalating. the local population and culture needs to sacrifice more and more and more and more and more and more
while the visitors, get to lsowly turn the host ocountry into their own old country which they fled from, which they made into a ********.

either the host country becomes like the country these refugees flee from, or people get tired of getting told **** you culture, and this inferiour culture keeps creeping and creeping until there is nothing left anymore!

or the more likely thing which is happening more and more is that people get tired of being told your culture needs to die, this inferior culture gets to do as they please. and then they stand up and vote! and if that wont work their will be a civil war. dmecoracy is accepting the outcome of an election. but with brexit sometimes people fail to accept the outcome1 when that happens even though people vote agains *** and it keeps getting pushed their will be civil war, it will spread across the world!

what is happening in france now. is exactly what i mean. extreme left, left cent right extreme right everyone is protesting. because the government decides so much for the wholepopulation that 1 catalyst explodes everything! high diesel prices. and suddenly everyone is protesting. medics joined in and polcie is in verge of joining in

this is what happens when leftist piece of ***** take over.

note marine le penn was gonna win the elleciotn but 1 week before the UN, USA and globalist decided to censor marine le pen! so she lost.

the german ******** is further down the road, but those people have been broken because of the historical stuff that they did. so they think they need to be punished and stfu. but other european countries are awakening

meanwhile in poland not a single allah has been akhbarred
 
Not surprising to me. Since most tax revenue comes from the rich, they'd benefit the most from tax cuts.

That's not remotely true as stated. There are plenty of ways to structure tax cuts so that the benefits accrue to groups other than the most wealthy. To begin with, cutting the marginal rates borne by middle to lower income earners, while leaving the marginal rates for upper income earners the same. Or, by adding/increasing deductions targeted to middle or lower classes. It might even be possible to achieve net tax reductions while cutting the rates for middle/lower class and eliminating or reducing deductions for most wealth, etc. The Republican tax bill disproportionately benefited the wealthiest because that's precisely what they were intended to do. It was a payoff to the Republican donor class and by no means intended to benefit middle/lower classes in any way proportionately.
 
That's not remotely true as stated. There are plenty of ways to structure tax cuts so that the benefits accrue to groups other than the most wealthy. To begin with, cutting the marginal rates borne by middle to lower income earners, while leaving the marginal rates for upper income earners the same. Or, by adding/increasing deductions targeted to middle or lower classes. It might even be possible to achieve net tax reductions while cutting the rates for middle/lower class and eliminating or reducing deductions for most wealth, etc. The Republican tax bill disproportionately benefited the wealthiest because that's precisely what they were intended to do. It was a payoff to the Republican donor class and by no means intended to benefit middle/lower classes in any way proportionately.

Another was would be to have financial institutions offer deals with more favorable terms at lower amounts. For example lots of IRAs require several thousand as an initial deposit.

I’m sure those with much deeper financial,, economic and bank knowledge could come up with better plans. But there was to be ways to allow more investment from the poor. A chance to grow.
 
It took Trump just two years to solve the trade imbalance with China. The swamp has been avoiding it, lying to us about it (Obama), or chattering to it. Not Trump.

That's what I call winning and wonder how many votes he'll pick up from this victory. Gotta be a 5-10% swing to be had here.
 
It took Trump just two years to solve the trade imbalance with China. The swamp has been avoiding it, lying to us about it (Obama), or chattering to it. Not Trump.

That's what I call winning and wonder how many votes he'll pick up from this victory. Gotta be a 5-10% swing to be had here.
link?
 
Back
Top