What's new
By:

Another Al trade

Hotttnickkk said:
I understand what you're saying, and if that offer is accepted I'd be very happy from the Jazz stand point. I'm just playing Devil's Advocate here in seeing how realistic it would be for Cleveland to give up those picks for 1 year of Jefferson.
Click to expand...

See this is so dumb. I kill KOC because he hasnt traded Jefferson yet, and everyone tells me. No bluesrocker. Cant you see. It will be better to trade Al with one year left because teams will covet Al+ expiring contract. But I have been saying all along it would be better to trade Al sooner before people have more chances to see his flaws and because they would get more than a one year rent.

Now all of a sudden people are starting to realize the negative side to trying to trade him with one year. Now he has less value. 2 years would have been a better point to trade him at. Now all he is worth is crap, because he is just a 1 year rental. Nobody is going to offer up anything great for him unless they can unload a bad contract.

So get ready folks, and wake up to reality. Jefferson isnt going any where. And Sloan junior is coaching so you are going to see a lot more Jefferson next year.
 
So should we just have a stock response to every TRADE AL thread? We can just copy-and-paste it into every discussion. Maybe we could, then, put the message board on auto-pilot for the entire offseason?

These threads have the potential to be discussions about something other than WHAT DO YOU THINK THE JAZZ WILL DO? They are discussions responding to the question WOULD YOU CONSIDER THIS? WHY OR WHY NOT? These are separate discussions. Why let the former invade the latter every single time?
 
NAOS said:
So should we just have a stock response to every TRADE AL thread? We can just copy-and-paste it into every discussion. Maybe we could, then, put the message board on auto-pilot for the entire offseason?

These threads have the potential to be discussions about something other than WHAT DO YOU THINK THE JAZZ WILL DO? They are discussions responding to the question WOULD YOU CONSIDER THIS? WHY OR WHY NOT? These are separate discussions. Why let the former invade the latter every single time?
Click to expand...

NAOS: With all due respect, I think this is an overreaction. This thread is 4 pages of discussion. Part of that discussion exampled what some feel will happen. No biggie, imo. I'm not sure it's reasonable to post a trade idea and expect there to be a moretorium, of sorts, on speaking to what some feel will actually happen in the future.
 
PKM said:
NAOS: With all due respect, I think this is an overreaction. This thread is 4 pages of discussion. Part of that discussion exampled what some feel will happen. No biggie, imo. I'm not sure it's reasonable to post a trade idea and expect there to be a moretorium, of sorts, on speaking to what some feel will actually happen in the future.
Click to expand...

maybe the caps made it seem as if I was mad. I'm not.
Also, if my post was a message, it certainly wasn't aimed at you because you, in general, add heaps of substance to this board.
There are some people whose minds would be blown by the distinction I made. I'm just trying to help them out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top