As I said in my earlier post, Jazz made a run off of a novelty. Mavs called a timeout, calmed things, got into their isos early, crashed the glass and were back to gaining ground. Whole point of my post was that it was unsustainable and after the initial run, Mavs, again, were the better team.Ok if you want to call coming back from a huge deficit getting out to shed then I just don't know how to respond to that. It was our best lineup. It worked the best. I think that things that with the best should be used more than things that don't work good.
The mavs weren't going ground, the jazz were gaining ground.
We played the same switch scheme with Rudy and they attacked Mitchell, tell me why they wouldn't attack Mitchell with Paschall in? How much difference would Paschall make in those 2 situations where Mitchell gave up 2 easy baskets to Dinwiddie?