It's not the 2010's anymore. You only get second rounders for taking on bad contracts.Rather than take swings with the capspace during a youth movement you should be taking on bad contracts for draft capital.
It's not the 2010's anymore. You only get second rounders for taking on bad contracts.Rather than take swings with the capspace during a youth movement you should be taking on bad contracts for draft capital.
Lauri says Hi.“That guy” still takes time to develop too though.
Bigger issue is we just can’t get “that guy” without proper tanking.
Since the Jazz basically don’t have any and have to get to the salary floor, I think that’s absolutely fine. They’re not going to be able to rent the space forever anyway.It's not the 2010's anymore. You only get second rounders for taking on bad contracts.
They haven’t been tanking, they’re just bad and unlucky.The tanking strategy, a proven winner. The Pistons look great with it!
Build the team to lose, and you build a team of losers.The tanking strategy, a proven winner. The Pistons look great with it!
It's fine when you don't have a bunch of young talent but I would rather give our youngsters consistent minutes over some vet reclamation project.Taking in reclamation projects is a valid strategy for bad teams. You may prefer the other option personally, but both are still valid.
Lmao shut up. The FO job is not to tell fans what is going on in real timeNah.
While recognizing long term, there is flexibility, but they have obviously not been super straight with fans and the team. That's inexcusable, and the reason why so many were rightfully pissed the last trade deadline.
You been one of the most vocal guys in repeating that we lack young talent, so color me confused here.It's fine when you don't have a bunch of young talent but I would rather give our youngsters consistent minutes over some vet reclamation project.