I don't consider basic manners to be foolish.
Then I guess it is a good thing that everyone has shown good manners in here.
I don't consider basic manners to be foolish.
If you don't mind, I would like to travel that distance, a few sentences at time. That would allow me to focus on what the basis behind the argument is.
Please go on. I'm listening.
That's a little like posting up your point guards to compensate for their lack of height and forcing centers to dribble the ball across the court, isn't it? 'You're better at us than this, so you can't do it'? Again, why not allow both?
Then I guess it is a good thing that everyone has shown good manners in here.
I believe God exists.
Step one, once we can both agree that this is the beginning of my beliefs, we can go on to what I believe the character of said God is.
With me so far?
This analogy assumes that these callings are primarily for the benefit of the congregation rather than the individual. I'm not assuming that, so I suppose we are still at an impasse.
I will continue to consider you over-analytic and hyper-sensitive, and you can continue to consider me misguided and foolish. Fair enough?
No questions so far (at least, none relevant to this discussion).
Telling someone else what their motivations are is not good manners. Were you raised by wolves?
I apologize to all the wolves in here for indicating they may be less civilized than humans.
If the callings are not there primarily for the benefit of the congregation, why have them at all?
Telling someone else what their motivations are is not good manners. Were you raised by wolves?
I apologize to all the wolves in here for indicating they may be less civilized than humans.
I have already answered this question. Please refer to post #348.
The fact that you are (re)asking me this question leads me to believe that you are not interested in understanding my position, so much as looking for some way to trap me, so you can "win".
I am not interested in discussion as competition.
So are we on the same page or aren't we? No point in continuing on if we are not in agreement.