Banning reverse trolls

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by Sloanfeld, Feb 24, 2011.

  1. Sloanfeld

    Sloanfeld Banned

    1,340
    98
    48
    May 26, 2010
    Can we ban reverse trolls? You know, the ones who act all superior to everyone and while they don't intend to stir up trouble they always have to remind us that they don't like a person and crap their threads/posts rather than ignoring them or disregarding their post altogether.
     
  2. JJ Rage

    JJ Rage Active Member

    956
    126
    43
    May 25, 2010


    You mean like you?
     
    Hitman likes this.
  3. TroutBum

    TroutBum My Member's Premium Contributor

    11,883
    1,631
    228
    May 26, 2010
    I really do hate you.
     
  4. Sloanfeld

    Sloanfeld Banned

    1,340
    98
    48
    May 26, 2010
    Hey man, I got your back on the Me-Will thing. Let's stick together.
     
  5. bigb

    bigb Free at last!!! Contributor

    9,056
    1,288
    233
    May 26, 2010
    Oh the irony of you making this post is so incredibly rich I can hardly stand it.
     
    vegas likes this.
  6. Sloanfeld

    Sloanfeld Banned

    1,340
    98
    48
    May 26, 2010
    It's clear that you and JJ Rage don't even know what the hell I'm talking about. I'll give a semi-detailed example with fake usernames for you remedial buffoons:

    Thread: dakotaJazz: NBA to lockout for TWO YEARS!!!!

    Reply 1: luckyfortynine: Fail

    Reply 2: PP Cage: I wish you would lock out for two years.

    Reply 3: Numerisuck: this poster is currently on your ignore list


    The three posters who replied in this example are the reverse trolls. They don't intend to start trouble, but they make unnecessary comments over and over when they are not warranted.
     
    UB likes this.
  7. moevillini

    moevillini the Chief Old D'oh Staff Member

    10,521
    1,010
    228
    May 26, 2010
    hey Sloanfelled, I gotta question for you - - in the great pot and kettle debate, who's the winner?
     
  8. LogGrad98

    LogGrad98 Well-Known Member Contributor

    22,972
    5,479
    388
    Jul 7, 2010
    I think I understand. Comments like this:

    The Bozzer comment is not meant to start trouble (debatable) but it is certainly not warranted in the context of the thread. Gotcha.
     
  9. Sloanfeld

    Sloanfeld Banned

    1,340
    98
    48
    May 26, 2010
    A difference of opinion is totally separate from calling someone names or expressing dislike for somebody. Do you have a learning disability or something?
     
    freakazoid likes this.
  10. LogGrad98

    LogGrad98 Well-Known Member Contributor

    22,972
    5,479
    388
    Jul 7, 2010
    OK so in bold you define it as an unwarranted comment used over and over. You refer to Boozer and how stupid everyone else is because they do not love Boozer over and over in every thread whether it is warranted or not.

    So you got nailed on that one, so you changed the definition. Calling names or expressing dislike. So then you call Numberica "Numerisuck" and accuse me of having a learning disability. Pretty much encompasses your second definition.

    No matter what definition you use, you are the best example of a reverse troll.

    Care to change it again and go for a trifecta?
     
    Jason likes this.
  11. NAOS

    NAOS Well-Known Member

    20,210
    4,826
    263
    May 27, 2010
    This thread is awesome
     
  12. VINYLONE

    VINYLONE Bringin' the diversity! Contributor

    11,037
    511
    113
    May 25, 2010
    Feld getting owned left and right...
     
  13. Sloanfeld

    Sloanfeld Banned

    1,340
    98
    48
    May 26, 2010
    YOU DID NOT COMPREHEND MY ORIGINAL POST. I SAID I USED FAKE NAMES. I DIDN'T CALL NUMBERICA ANYTHING. MY COMMENT QUESTIONING YOUR INTELLIGENCE IS VALID.

    And this is MY thread. I can't reverse troll on my thread. The Boozer stuff is simply a difference of opinion, I'm not attacking anyone by expressing that.
     
  14. LogGrad98

    LogGrad98 Well-Known Member Contributor

    22,972
    5,479
    388
    Jul 7, 2010
    The fake name you choose shows you are a reverse troll, as it was directly an insult. It would take a total buffoon to not recognize that adding "suck" to the end of someone's name is an insult. I don't type your name as Sloanfailed as that is also an insult. I know you are not a buffoon so you must be trolling. Might as well close the thread now and initiate the first reverse troll ban. Bye Sloanfeld.
     
  15. Sloanfeld

    Sloanfeld Banned

    1,340
    98
    48
    May 26, 2010
    Ugh, even after I gave an example of what reverse trolling is you STILL don't get it. Re-read my third post in this thread again. I'm done with you, so I'll just leave it at this...

    SUBMIT TO SLOANFAIL
     
  16. JJ Rage

    JJ Rage Active Member

    956
    126
    43
    May 25, 2010
    You're trolling with this thread.
     
  17. Gameface

    Gameface I actually REALLY like Gobert! Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    25,600
    7,887
    428
    May 25, 2010
    This is beautiful.
     
  18. Inn Dawn

    Inn Dawn Well-Known Member

    1,227
    110
    113
    May 26, 2010
    I beg to differ. I think he's doing quite nicely. Still don't care for him, dough.
     
  19. freakazoid

    freakazoid Well-Known Member

    5,121
    1,239
    228
    Jul 3, 2010
    Awesome.
     
    Boondocksaint27 likes this.
  20. Gyp Rosetti

    Gyp Rosetti Banned

    12,425
    651
    113
    May 26, 2010
    I'm curious where "Boozer>God" and "Submit to Sloanfeld" and the like fall. I mean, they add so much substance to the threads or chat room that they couldn't possibly be considered trolling, reverse trolling or anything else in the lineage. Right?
     

Share This Page