What's new
By:

Caitlin Clark

Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
Oh I read it all, but you’re still wrong
Click to expand...
Okay. But that’s different from you reading one sentence and asking me to explain something that you could’ve learned had you read more than the ONE SENTENCE you quoted. Furthermore, the post was entirely subjective. It’s my opinion. So the appropriate response from you should’ve been “I disagree” not “you’re still wrong.”

Reading isn’t your thing is it?
 
The Thriller said:
Okay. But that’s different from you reading one sentence and asking me to explain something that you could’ve learned had you read more than the ONE SENTENCE you quoted. Furthermore, the post was entirely subjective. It’s my opinion. So the appropriate response from you should’ve been “I disagree” not “you’re still wrong.”

Reading isn’t your thing is it?
Click to expand...
I did read the whole thing.
 
The Thriller said:
No, you don’t. Otherwise you wouldn’t have said this.


Grow up. Just admit you read one sentence out of an entire post and threw out a worthless reply demanding an explanation when one was already given.
Click to expand...
No I read it, I understand the premise, but I still can’t rap around it that you prefer the woman’s game even with all that. It’s nonsense to me so I still want to know how you could even still with a straight face say that. You’ve always sounded like a bitter man with an ax to grind. Not saying your old but that’s how you come off.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
No I read it, I understand the premise, but I still can’t rap around it that you prefer the woman’s game even with all that. It’s nonsense to me so I still want to know how you could even still with a straight face say that. You’ve always sounded like a bitter man with an ax to grind. Not saying your old but that’s how you come off.
Click to expand...

dude don't bother. That clown is the reason the ignore function was invented. He never met a topic he could resist from giving his ignorant smug condescending 2 cents worth. I've never read someone so simultaneously dumb and unaware of the fact, and so willing to display their own ignorance for all to laugh at.
 
Douchebag K said:
dude don't bother. That clown is the reason the ignore function was invented. He never met a topic he could resist from giving his ignorant smug condescending 2 cents worth. I've never read someone so simultaneously dumb and unaware of the fact, and so willing to display their own ignorance for all to laugh at.
Click to expand...

What did I say this time?
 
I watched part of Caitlin's first game last night. I was impressed at how much better athletes they have in the WNBA vs NCAAW (obvious, I know). Caitlyn had 10 turnovers and the ones I watched were pretty bad. She would make a pass to a spot, and not expect the defender to be able to get to that spot as quickly as they are able to in the WNBA. It's going to be an adjustment.
 
The Thriller said:
Okay. But that’s different from you reading one sentence and asking me to explain something that you could’ve learned had you read more than the ONE SENTENCE you quoted. Furthermore, the post was entirely subjective. It’s my opinion. So the appropriate response from you should’ve been “I disagree” not “you’re still wrong.”

Reading isn’t your thing is it?
Click to expand...
Dude he just barely learned to read. We should be praising him that he's finally past "see Dick run" for God's sake, and here you are asking for basic 3rd grade reading comprehension? What's the matter with you?
 
SoberasHotRod said:
I watched part of Caitlin's first game last night. I was impressed at how much better athletes they have in the WNBA vs NCAAW (obvious, I know). Caitlyn had 10 turnovers and the ones I watched were pretty bad. She would make a pass to a spot, and not expect the defender to be able to get to that spot as quickly as they are able to in the WNBA. It's going to be an adjustment.
Click to expand...
Her entire success hinges on her making those adjustments. If she can, she could be one of the best to ever play in the WNBA. If not, she could just be Harold Miner.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
No I read it, I understand the premise, but I still can’t rap around it that you prefer the woman’s game even with all that. It’s nonsense to me so I still want to know how you could even still with a straight face say that. You’ve always sounded like a bitter man with an ax to grind. Not saying your old but that’s how you come off.
Click to expand...
Speaking of which, have you had your Ensure today? Make sure you get the one with extra fiber. Need to stay regular.
 
Had another triple double tonight. She has been on fire since the olympics break. It makes sense since that was her first real break in almost a year.

Her defense is really bad. She turns the ball over way too much. Yet she is already one of the best players in the WNBA, the rest of her game is that good.
 
SoberasHotRod said:
Had another triple double tonight. She has been on fire since the olympics break. It makes sense since that was her first real break in almost a year.

Her defense is really bad. She turns the ball over way too much. Yet she is already one of the best players in the WNBA, the rest of her game is that good.
Click to expand...
I'm always shocked by how consistently she has extremely high turnover games.
 
Crazy statistic: 14% of all Flagrant Fouls committed throughout the entire WNBA this season have been committed by Chicago Sky players against Caitlyn Clark.

www.si.com

Chicago is Committing Flagrant Fouls Against Caitlin Clark At a Sky High Rate

Indiana Fever rookie icon Caitlin Clark was on the receiving end of two flagrant fouls from the Chicago Sky on Friday. One of these flagrant fouls came in the
www.si.com www.si.com

Many of them look like they are straight up trying to injure her.


View: https://x.com/WNBARookieWatch/status/1829693450645590508
 
Al-O-Meter said:
Crazy statistic: 14% of all Flagrant Fouls committed throughout the entire WNBA this season have been committed by Chicago Sky players against Caitlyn Clark.

www.si.com

Chicago is Committing Flagrant Fouls Against Caitlin Clark At a Sky High Rate

Indiana Fever rookie icon Caitlin Clark was on the receiving end of two flagrant fouls from the Chicago Sky on Friday. One of these flagrant fouls came in the
www.si.com www.si.com

Many of them look like they are straight up trying to injure her.


View: https://x.com/WNBARookieWatch/status/1829693450645590508
Click to expand...

Do you actually care about the WNBA outside of the culture war aspects you are obsessed with?
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Do you actually care about the WNBA outside of the culture war aspects you are obsessed with?
Click to expand...
Is Caitlin Clark part of the culture war?

The culture war is actually low on the things that have my attention. It is only an outsized portion of what I post due to it being a main topic of interest to the board. Very few seem to want to talk youth club sports, the FAA delaying SpaceX's Starship to late November, the latest developments in AI, etc. I can't say the WNBA is high on my list either, but I do admire standout athletes and I think Caitlin Clark qualifies. I also find it bizarre that she is a singular force driving up the interest level, which raises all boats, and so many competitors seem to loathe her even though the broad rise in interest will put money in their pockets. Trying to take her out plays to me as biting the hand that feeds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top