Hantlers
Well-Known Member
Harden's numbers weren't better last night.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2
Holy **** man.
Harden's numbers weren't better last night.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2
His impact was greater though...
Basketball box scores are total garbage when it comes to evaluating individual player performance/ability.
I don't think any intelligent poster is saying Burks played poorly. He didn't. He just didn't play as well as Harden, which is expected. Nothing wrong with that.
I've been saying it for three years now. He is C.J. Miles, version 2.0, and that is being generous.
Want to lose the game? Make sure number 10 is on the floor. Want to make the opposing guard look amazing? Make sure number 10 is guarding him. Want to see a whole bunch of ill-advised, quick, low percentage shots? Make sure that number 10 has the ball in his hands. Want to see un-assists? You know the drill. Ya, I said un-assists.
I wouldn't stuff Alec Burks up my *** if I had room for a Volkswagon, and neither should you.
I don't think any intelligent poster is saying Burks played poorly. He didn't. He just didn't play as well as Harden, which is expected. Nothing wrong with that.
Most of all I liked his effort, but he still allowed penetration.
Burks has more assists if his teammates hit some shots.....
Oh so this thread was made because Alec Burks isn't better than James Harden? Well now it is just a much, much worse thread than before.
I don't think any intelligent poster is saying Burks played poorly. He didn't. He just didn't play as well as Harden, which is expected. Nothing wrong with that.
E. J. you have issues!!
Please take them somewhere else.
Jazz fans are homers? Well, stop the presses! The word Fan implies that. No doubt you are a homer for whatever team you actually do like as fans all over the world are for their favorite team.
You are for sure not the brightest kid in the kindergarten!