What's new
By:

Can The Jazz Fix Wiggins?

Handlogten's Heros said:
If we are looking at truly awful contracts why not go for taking assets and getting Batum... He had a weird year, but I think there is a functional player in there still... no where near worth his contract either way, but maybe you could pilfer two 1sts for him and make a good reclamation project out of him. I mean Quin seems to get the best out of guys...

He made his threes... solid passer... just usage rate fell of a cliff. Seems like a guy that could do well in our type of system... if he cares about basketball still.

I will say I'd rather get a good first and take on Batum than go for Wiggins without any other compensation. Hopefully you could get two firsts.

I wouldn't really want this deal, but I'd want it more than Wiggins or Love... I think I'd rather set myself on fire than any of these options.
Click to expand...


c'mon Kevin Love is good !!!
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Tough to fix the problems there imo... motivation, work ethic, etc are things development staff may not be able to fix sadly.

That’s too big of a bet to make... that feels like a Sacramento Kings move but they likely prefer Barnes.
Click to expand...
This is exactly the problem Mitchell has, motivation to play defense, and our development staff and team D concept has actually actively made it worse. I have zero faith we would do anything with Wiggins other than bring out the inner chucker in him and turn him into another turnstile on defense. That's all we need is another hero for hero ball. And a less efficient one at that.
 
I know I said the Warriors package was good but its kinda iffy... Kuminga is the guy that is most intriguing... I'd kinda rather get a mystery bag of picks for Rudy and not send him to GS... just use their offer as leverage. The also owe a pick to Memphis so you'd get a pick in 22 (not great) and then maybe 26 (which is more juicy).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top