Cavs/Kings Trade - Should the Jazz have. . .
- Thread starter default
- Start date
Brown Notes
Well-Known Member
Cassipi can shoot from the perimeter. He'll be a good bench player. On the Cavs he could start. He's pretty young and Hasn't played with a good distributor yet.
Also JJ is not that good. This was a win trade for the Cavs, I'm not sure what the Kings were smoking.
Also JJ is not that good. This was a win trade for the Cavs, I'm not sure what the Kings were smoking.
Brown Notes
Well-Known Member
Cassipi can shoot from the perimeter. He'll be a good bench player. On the Cavs he could start. He's pretty young and Hasn't played with a good distributor yet.
Also JJ is not that good. This was a win trade for the Cavs, I'm not sure what the Kings were smoking.
Also JJ is not that good. This was a win trade for the Cavs, I'm not sure what the Kings were smoking.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Great move for the Cavs.
Not so sure about the Kings... Maybe they feel that JJ can be a Millsap like player alongside a developing force inside (hopefully for them) in Cousins?
Not so sure about the Kings... Maybe they feel that JJ can be a Millsap like player alongside a developing force inside (hopefully for them) in Cousins?
JJ Hickson has talent and occasionally puts up good numbers but he is very frustrating to coach. Scott and him butted heads a lot last year because Hickson doesn't always play hard. Cassipi has not been happy in Sactown and I think they wanted to get rid of him. Both teams getting rid of headaches and picking up role players. I would been ok with Cassipi and the pick even if it wasn't protected. Next years picks could be very big. I like what Cleveland is doing. Their rebuild is coming along nicely. Another reason they got rid of Hickson is because they drafted an PF. Perhaps Sacramento is seeing the Jazz get bigger and they need size. They have Cousins and Thompson. Dalmbert is a FA.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
They're high on Jimmer.