The problem here is not that people are not having a conversation with you, it's that you are having a different conversation than they are. That's the problem with a forum like this. People respond on their phones, or want to have a casual conversation, and then the guy who is doing research responds from his laptop while taking a break from reading papers about the state of the american healthcare system.
Its not that you are more intelligent or more well versed than others on any type of subject (granted, you seem to be a well read young man), but the conversations you get into on this forum are one sided because you are engaging in an academic manner with non academic types. The way western academia is set up is inherently argumentative, and that's the way your posts come off. You are using the persuasive writing type that so many college students have been taught will get them far in life. The trouble is that normal conversations in the real world don't happen the same way that academic conversations do.
You can say this is a lazy excuse, or that its beside the point, and give more reasons to refute others points about regulation, but the point is that people who have been in their fields for a few years have very different critical thinking and communication skills than a kid who has been reading and writing academic papers. And that is why I say the conversations are different.
