What's new

CEO raises minimum wage to $70000, takes $70000 wage himself until profits are met.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
inherently? Not at all. Not even ****ing close. What about the pile of money that was thrown into swiss banks after the jews were killed? Should anybody have been proud of that? Surely you see the disastrous assumptions your making. Why did you backpedal from MEANING and MONEY?

You're putting the cart way, way, way before the horse. Like, the cart is next to the field, and the horse hasn't been born yet.

I tried to make it simpler before, so lets try it again, and get personal.

What are you, NAOS, most proud of in this life?
 
Class-warfare is just a fear-mongering term. Any movements done to try and address income inequality are immediately considered "class warfare". Baffling.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Curious. Why is income inequality something that should be addressed?
 
You're putting the cart way, way, way before the horse. Like, the cart is next to the field, and the horse hasn't been born yet.

I tried to make it simpler before, so lets try it again, and get personal.

What are you, NAOS, most proud of in this life?

you realize there is a record of everything we've written to each other, right?

let me say this again: the comparative that you're trying to erect between pride and money and taxation and whatever is fundamentally broken. It's a bad question. The best thing to do with bad questions is to ignore them.

Why don't you review what's been said and then ask a better one. Or, at least fess up to the fact that you've made some wild assumptions and we can both move on.

You've been spot on about a lot of things. And I've championed you for them. I think you've let winning get to your head here.
 
Didn't cover a lot of it. Moreso, even the medicare expansion the government was giving out money to start, the same one that a lot of states(including Utah) didn't go through with doesn't cover a lot of things.

And what if you had a job, but had a pre-existing condition?

Sucks for you I guess. Like I said the system was broken. Its just broken differently. If I made more money I'd probably have less of a problem with more being taken to help others. Selfish I guess but its just reality. I'm not in a position to be footing the bill for others problems.
 
you realize there is a record of everything we've written to each other, right?

let me say this again: the comparative that you're trying to erect between pride and money and taxation and whatever is fundamentally broken. It's a bad question. The best thing to do with bad questions is to ignore them.

Why don't you review what's been said and then ask a better one. Or, at least fess up to the fact that you've made some wild assumptions and we can both move on.

You've been spot on about a lot of things. And I've championed you for them. I think you've let winning get to your head here.

Stop talking, and answer my question.
 
If only there was a working social model provided by a society that could provide this for every child, not just the children of those who've made it. After all, why should a child have to pay for their parents mistakes?

Perhaps we'd need a robust organizational system that has the tools to make this available....

There isn't? Schooling here is cheap as hell if you want it to be. Anyone with a pulse can afford a 4 year degree, debt free.
 
Sucks for you I guess. Like I said the system was broken. Its just broken differently. If I made more money I'd probably have less of a problem with more being taken to help others. Selfish I guess but its just reality. I'm not in a position to be footing the bill for others problems.

You and me both buddy.
 
Back
Top