Maybe I'm not understanding this graph. I'm sure you posted it for a reason. Can you explain it to me please?
If you cannot make more than $15k you probably have no business in college in the first place. Go pick up a shovel. Most college kids in Utah can easily earn over $30,000/yr. Kids in New York can earn $15k in 3 summer months waiting tables.
Adding in cost of living is disingenuous. It's there regardless.
We haven't even gotten to all the subsidies and scholarships available to lower the cost even further.
If after all that you still cannot afford tuition then take out a $30,000 loan and finish a 4 year degree asap. It's a ****ing car payment for hell's sake. The vast majority of majors make either in the $55k-74.9k range or $75k+. You can guess the ones that don't (social sciences, teachers, film...).
Anyone with a pulse can graduate by 22 and skate through life doing the bare minimum and retire by 52-56 with 100% pre-retirement income while waiting for social security and medicare to kick in. School is cheap, our model is so easy it's almost sad.
Your first sentence has me a bit perplexed. Are you saying that if you come from an impoverished area and you're trying to better yourself, unless you're able to make some arbitrary amount yearly, you have no business going to college?
We agree on some things(we should make education better, we should find a way to resolve poverty). We disagree on others(other nations are making themselves great, raising taxes is bad). I think we can both argue about how unattainable a meaningful degree is in our system compared to other systems across the world. Other shenanigans.. blah blah blah. Great, status quo, as it should be.
But something you mentioned a few pages back... a seemingly running theme.. not exactly, but something along the lines of if the dollar falls, American corporations will ruin economies of every other nation they can weasel their way in to.
Is that correct?
Those are very basic terms to agree or disagree to. I find the source of the statistical problem and target policy there. You prefer to write that off as "status quo" and prescribe complete overhauls that may or may not help anything. Essentially, you glorify the upsides while not paying attention to the downsides or even aware they exist.
You and dalamaintnuthin keep grinding that raise taxes axe. America spends just as much as a % of GDP as Canada and many other developed nations. Our GDP increases faster and we earn more per capita than most other nations, especially on a PPP basis. This extra income allows us to have a lower safety net, for the most part because most of us can afford our own. Denmark makes just 70% of what Americans do. That extra 30% here provides a lot, on our own and with dignity.
Japanese auto manufacturers are currently receiving an $11,000 per vehicle windfall due to their currency devaluation that started in 2012. What effect do you suppose that has on US auto manufacturers?
It works the same both ways, but in the end beggar thy neighbor policies are no good for anyone so the US carries the burden of the rest of the world engaging in trade wars.
You have two things wrong there.
1. I'm not so much a proponent of tax increases as you think. First we should address tax dodgers. We, the people, need to demonize that more than draft dodgers of the 40's and 50's were. Then, if that hasn't done anything, look at making the government more lean and effective(because yes, I believe the government is bloated as all hell, and ineffective in their efforts). Then, if we're still effed, increase taxes. I point at Norway, and their high tax rate as an example of something that's working, and by a quantifiable measure, yields a happier and more prosperous populace.
I'll take this as Yes.
Which, in one way of thinking, makes us enslaved to the position we're in now.... enslaved by the rest of the world. Enslaved in one hell of a place, but still enslaved. I'm a jackass for complaining about it, I know, but slavery doesn't seem to be our forte. Don't we owe it to ourselves, and the rest of the world, to find an effective exit strategy?
Have you guys studied, for example, how Apple handles their offshore tax strategies? Mind-boggling how little they pay and the lengths they go through..
I believe in paying fair taxes. Hell, I even pay close to 25%.. but I won't pay a lot more than that. Some wealthy corps are paying less than 3% and the dollars they save/don't pay is difference-making.
We do go after tax dodgers, our system is built for it. People will always innovate and find ways to dodge taxes. We should expect us to do as much. The job of government is to seek out the new methods and catch up to tax dodging. We will always have a tax dodging "problem" as Dr. Jones stated. It's an endless cycle of playing catch up.
We will way, way, way agree to disagree on that. Compared to other topics, it's like seeing a running Pinto.It would actually help if the public ignored the issue a bit more. Politicizing it creates talking points and forces the two parties to fight against each other. If we ignored it then they would gather bipartisan support in committee and pass fixes quietly.
It's not exactly a one way street. We export inflation, for example.
Our export strategy is to lift the world out of poverty and allow natural adjustments to equalize things out. Export dependent nations do not stay that way forever nor do import nations. It takes decades for things to reverse, however.