It's very clear that you stand for something you don't understand. Thank you, and good night.
Charlottesville
- Thread starter Saint Cy of JFC
- Start date
It's very clear that you stand for something you don't understand. Thank you, and good night.
Because whether it's sympathizing or enabling, it's still support. Which appears to be what you're doing.
As a nation, we can not move, nor be moving towards hate. Even if you label them Antifa, they're not generating hate(which WILL lead to violence) like Unite the Right is. Reacting to, sure, but not generating.
If you really don't want violence, you can't just wait it out. The violence will happen. You have to be open, and you have to actually discuss it. You have to weed it out from the stem. The government shouldn't need to get involved. The public should. And they are.
Last edited:
Red
Well-Known Member
BTW, the first couple of minutes of the Vice News mini-doc were shown by various networks,
with voiceovers of Trump, talking about "peaceful protestors" and "some fine people", in order to show the disconnect between what the cameras show was actually the case(and that mini-doc is being described as a defining moment in the development of the Vice News/HBO platform. Chuck Todd said "it gave me the chills") and what Trump said he saw. If anybody here can watch the first couple of minutes of that Vice mini-doc and kindly tell me who the "fine people" are, I'd be interested in knowing. Just curious....
with voiceovers of Trump, talking about "peaceful protestors" and "some fine people", in order to show the disconnect between what the cameras show was actually the case(and that mini-doc is being described as a defining moment in the development of the Vice News/HBO platform. Chuck Todd said "it gave me the chills") and what Trump said he saw. If anybody here can watch the first couple of minutes of that Vice mini-doc and kindly tell me who the "fine people" are, I'd be interested in knowing. Just curious....
His excuse rings hollow to me for this reason. If there is a march or protest that I was part of and this group showed up I'd either demand they leave or I'd leave myself. I'd flat out refuse to march with them. Then I'd make it as public as possible that I'd either kicked them out or left myself. That I detested their message and refused to even appear to be with them.
I have yet to see that anywhere.
Oh shoot. Maybe ya just don git the personality of people that are passionate bout somethin. These people, I know many good people like this that can not understand taking down tokens of there heritage. Shoot, evertime I drive through Spanish Fark I see some hick floatin a confederate flag off the bed of his pickup. I here Christians all the time sayin hows there way of life bein attacked. I here all these foreigners complainin bout ARE politics. What the hell they got to do meddling in ARE affairs? Typical liberal control freaks.
See, think is ya need to understand these people care about thinks to an maybe support from any angle is simply support. They gathering to protest they ain't tryin ta decipher who is this or that that ain't there focus it is the historical monument they care about. So your holier then thou statement is quit insulting an not understanding of basic human nature. Deep down you know there is good people that against these removals cause they feel there Heritage threatened. Maybe they are misguided but at least they is still good people with good intentions. You should show more sim paths toward them an not look down yer nose cause ya don understand em.
Tak
Well-Known Member
It's tiring to go against something that's only happening in your head, if you really want to think that I'm supporting Nazis and KKK by saying and showing why I don't like ANTIFA go have it, be happy and believe you have done your part to "stop fascism"
You know what is really funny though? You saying "You have to be open, and you have to actually discuss it" Hard to discuss something when you are automatically labeled as something you aren't.
No civility here indeed.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Imagine we are sitting around a table enjoying a holiday feast. I turn to you and say "Will you pass me the ham." You pass me the plate of ham but I say "No, the ham" as I Point to the mashed potatoes. you say "Uh, that's potatoes." I reply I eat ham and I eat that therefore that is ham." Imagine the look you would have on your face. That's the look I have on my face right now.
Many times, as is the case with ham or potatoes, the concept isn't all that complex and a simple dictionary search will be enough to educate you. In the case of fascism, as used here, a dictionary search would be enough to inform you that you have the wrong word but not really enough for you to understand the term. Our political thought is complex and often requires a little more reading, context, and historical perspective. If you are unwillingly to put in the effort to understand a term then you really shouldn't use it. This only debases language which in turns stifles thought. You can point at political things you don't like and say "That's bad.", but don't say fascist when you are pointing at a potato.
Your analogy makes 0 sense as I didn't call anything "fascist", I just said they share a certain tactic of fascist. Repressing speech is a tactic of fascist regimes.
How have your messages been anything short of sympathetic or enabling for a hate group? The "ANTIFA" you seem to be referring to is a bastardized American thing, and an extreme, extermist minority of the left. You appear to believe that they're the only people counter protesting, and stand on that platform as can be seen from the response to Stroked's post here:
When facing the likes of the Klan, and other various demonstrably hate oriented militant groups, of course people are gonna fall behind a militant shield. But they're not the leaders, they're not the heart of the message. I can't say the same for the Unite the Right movement.