Well y’all need to get over that idea. Which is a really bad idea anyway. Rudy’s the one going. I’ve said why several times. Confident it’s Rudy that goes.
Choose Gobert or Donovan, you can't have both!
- Thread starter 416Klawzz
- Start date
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Well Rudy gives us a better shot at a title so if you don’t care about titles, yes Mitchell should be kept.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
it’s all I’m asking. It’s proper etiquette.
Let me be very clear. You are NEVER winning a title with Rudy as your best player. Donovan’s potential ceiling is much higher than Rudy’s. Rudy keeps the floor higher, Donovan makes the ceiling higher. The Jazz should and will keep Donovan and that is 100% the correct decision.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
How many 6-1 superstars are there getting their team to the finals or close to?
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Mitchell’s are easier to find and develop. Gobert is a rare commodity it’s much easier to build around Gobert than it would be to do it around Mitchell.
How many center with little to no offensive skills are?
Not with what Donovan means to the franchise and community and who he is as a star. And not at this point in Rudy’s career. You can retool around Donovan much easier than Rudy at this point in their careers.
David Ginola 14
Well-Known Member
If okay Rudy is the team's 4th offensive option, how can we give him 40 million a year?
Keep Donovan..
Keep Donovan..
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
We win because of Rudy
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
There’s no one like Rudy, that’s my point. As far as DM goes, I don’t care what he means to the community, I care about the success of the team. Personally if there’s a guy the jazz like they could move up pretty damn high using Mitchell assuming he demanded he or Gobert be traded while also picking up other assets, and guess what the jazz would keep winning at or above the same pace because of Gobert. I don’t give a flying **** that Gobert doesn’t score as much as other offensive minded C’s. He turns a bottom tier defense (the jazz without Gobert) into a top half to middle of the pack defense and a middle of the pack defense into a top defense. Without Gobert we’re talking years of rebuilding.
We will not win a title with him and you cannot pay him a super max and ever expect to. Retooling around Mitchell is the right call if it comes to that and I don’t even really think it’s a debate. It will take a couple down years but long term is the best path.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
If you have a Gobert, you pay the **** out of him and you do it hard core!!!
With Gobert as a best and highest paid player we are never winning a championship. Period.
If you want to box yourself into a playoff team that exits the first or second round yearly.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
I don’t think you know what it takes to build a championship caliber team, hell I don’t think you know what one looks like.
I know Rudy can’t be the best player on that team. Of that I’m certain.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
With Gobert you need less parts. With Mitchell then you need to find another top end scorer close to as potent as Mitchell but someone that scores consistently as well against top end teams as he would against bottom dwellers. Far too often Mitchell struggles vs top teams, then you have to go find stud defenders and athletes at every level. That takes **** loads of time and money.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
He already is and has been the best player on this team. It ain’t going anywhere without Rudy as constructed you idiot, my god stop squeezing your head with your butt cheeks. Takes a special kind of idiot to do that.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
That’s because our main offensive weapon is a 6-1 sg.
He’s 23 and I’ll take him every day of the week and as has been mentioned. So will the Jazz.