The Big 12 would need to fill the spot in the North division open if Mizzou leaves. TCU wouldn't make a lot of sense in that scenario. Also, the Big 12 already has the Texas market in its back pocket. Why would they need to/want to add another Texas team?
I'd think that Texas would prefer to hold the Big 12 together as it gives them much more power than if they joined the PAC-XX allowing them to create the lucrative TV deal that has been mentioned. If they join the PAC-XX the TV deal will not be nearly as rich for Texas.
Again, I'll ask. Do Utah fans really care what conference they get an invite to just as long as it is a BCS conference? Is the PAC-XX more attractive than the Big 12? If so, why?
This whole discussion is asinine. Utah to the PAC 10 was never anything more than speculation. I have yet to hear any credible evidence that this was even on the table. The local sports radio hacks going on and on never made it any more real.
But now it makes even more sense for Utah to join Pac 10(well now Pac 11 and counting...)
Colorado was listed as potential MWC school, but like that was going to happen..we need to get out of the MWC(or invite the best from the WAC, which I haven't heard much about)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.