I hear ya. Listen he probably is an elite shooter. But he’s not the cream of the crop. Yet. Another season like that and he will be.
He had one elite season. That is enough for me.
I hear ya. Listen he probably is an elite shooter. But he’s not the cream of the crop. Yet. Another season like that and he will be.
,Then there's still another level of shooting value when a guy can really gun it off the dribble
, hasn't shown me enough shooting off movement to really get in with the Klays/prime Korvers/Millers of the world.
My argument would be he just doesn’t have the track record yet.
Redick
Korver
Thompson
Curry
Other Curry
Our Bogey
That’s a quick six there without any thinking.
Here’s a video of Duncan Robinson... its compilation of three consecutive games where he made 7+ threes in each game. I’ll let y’all decide for your self. He’s pretty good though.
This is what is missing in the voting. Most ignore role players. However I believe most star laden teams would overpower teams built with good not great teams with players that know their roles.I recall how much better the jazz all of a sudden became after trading for Korver a role player at the very end of his career
He’s only gotten getter in the nba? I know only two seasons.Interesting to note that he got worse over time at Michigan shooting just 38.4% on <4 attempts his last year at there. Nothing special. Elite from the line though. Great mechanics and a great FT % are prob the best two factors.
Fwiw, Duncan Robinson will not be the deciding factor in these matchups. That isn't a knock on him or the pick. Just the way it is.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Your missing the point. Lots of voters will compare players of each position on each team. The team with overall better players usually gets the nod in a vote. I’m also a firm believer in pure talent will win every time in a playoff setting where the overall team can be, not always more successful in a season setting.Elite shooting to complement playmakers seems like it could be important. I'm loaded with scorers: KD, Kyrie, Oladipo, DeRozan
Your missing the point. Lots of voters will compare players of each position on each team. The team with overall better players usually gets the nod in a vote. I’m also a firm believer in pure talent will win every time in a playoff setting where the overall team can be, not always more successful in a season setting.
I'll be here if they want to vote for a team with four All NBA players in their prime, complemented by peak Kyle Korver on steriods plus Vuc and Nurkic.
I'll win the simulation, don't really care about the vote.
Well you've got Kyrie and Derozan who don't make anyone better. Then Vic and KD who are on the wrong side of 2 very serious injuries. So, yeah, its an interesting team for sure.
Buddy Hield.My argument would be he just doesn’t have the track record yet.
Redick
Korver
Thompson
Curry
Other Curry
Our Bogey
That’s a quick six there without any thinking.
Yeah they all suck. This is why I don't care about the "fan voting".