I guess I don't think the first two stars are good enough, either. We've see Clarkson in the playoffs... we've seen Collins in the playoffs... they ain't it... Lillard has been great in the playoffs in general but as the single offensive initiator it hasn't been enough for his team. And we don't have a good second initiator. Lauri is more of a finnisher of offense than creator of offense.I'm not super high on Collins/Agbaji or anything, but they fit the team nicely.
I just dont see a huge need for a third star. The Jazz have the 3rd scoring option in Clarkson and Collins is a guy who can reliably get you 13-15 per game.
I mean... should I really outline the top difference in what Denver has vs what we would have? Lillard is not close to the player Jokic is.Who was the 3rd player for Denver? Who was the 3rd player for Miami?
Miami was a flukey team. I don't consider them legit contender. I think they were one of the luckiest finals teams in recent memory ...Miami's 3rd/4th/5th guy were Max Strus, Caleb Martin, and Gabe Vincent?
I mean... I agree we would have a good team with Lillard... the question is - is "good" worth it? Is it worth it having a good team and being a second round exit team again after giving up half our assets? I want a great team, a team that has legit window for contention. I don't think Lillard is enough to make this team a legit contender.I think we are letting perfection be the enemy of good at this point when we get too caught up in having the perfect lineup to compete.