That’s a good point. We give them back their picks.There is absolutely a deal to be made here if Garland was truly available. They’d love to get their own picks back.
Win-win.
That’s a good point. We give them back their picks.There is absolutely a deal to be made here if Garland was truly available. They’d love to get their own picks back.
True..Or they could be trading Garland to move Don to PG?
I said there's no deal here for Utah.There’s a legit rumor Altman’s looking around .
I said there's no deal here for Utah.
How about Hendricks and a first?I said there's no deal here for Utah.
How about Hendricks and a first?
The same reason we decided to trade Rudy and Donovan. I don’t know just spitballing.
There isnt. They want wings and forwards who can shoot. We giving up Lauri?There is absolutely a deal to be made here if Garland was truly available. They’d love to get their own picks back.
So Cleveland is giving up an all-star guard for a mid lottery pick and a first rounder?How about Hendricks and a first?
There isnt. They want wings and forwards who can shoot. We giving up Lauri?
Who is undersized and hasn’t forgotten it done.. plus they have a glaring hole at SF.So Cleveland is giving up an all-star guard for a mid lottery pick and a first rounder?