NAOS
Well-Known Member
I guess this means I’m more into the yes column than I thought I was
I guess this means I’m more into the yes column than I thought I was
The athletic Dallas guy seemed to think it'd take a pick to offload the salary... tbh I don't think so. Even if we got 31 instead of 18 that'd be a nice pull.For Ed and Tony? And it comes with a pick? **** yes—especially since it forces the org to go a different direction with the backup big.
We aren’t in a luxurious spot when it comes to perimeter defenders. So, yeah.
You could have both and having one more rotation guard means you don't feel as inclined to overpay JC. The backcourt gets a little crowded but I think you can mix Wright in with other guards because he's got great size. You could also move on from JC in a sign and trade or Conley in a trade for a wing or big.We're planning to re-sign Clarkson, no?
Not sure what you are hearing... not sure where he'd go. Capspace teams aren't likely to use space on him and there won't be a lot of good MLE options.I think the wish is to resign JC but he is making sounds like he is going elsewhere.
JC is saying all the right things but then says "in the end this is a business." I think Haywood said something similar before betraying us. Maybe I'm just being paranoid.Not sure what you are hearing... not sure where he'd go. Capspace teams aren't likely to use space on him and there won't be a lot of good MLE options.
LolJC is saying all the right things but then says "in the end this is a business." I think Haywood said something similar before betraying us. Maybe I'm just being paranoid.