What's new

Dennis Lindsey: We will be VERY active in free agency

I think we can now safely say we know Dennis' MO. He likes to deflect attention away from real questions by talking about things that fans can't see. Players he almost traded for, players he considered trading, draft picks that were almost bought, players that nearly fell to the Jazz, FA's that he might have called, and success the Jazz almost had. It's an interesting technique, and effective for a new GM. I wonder if the effectiveness runs out over tine as the audience grows numb to the message.

eeyore.jpg
 
Why would he answer that question? No matter who he says you will respond that that player either sucks or isn't nearly as good as hill.

You are really high on hill and hated almost everyone in the draft even guys that went earlier like j murray and buddy hield.

It's pointless for him to give you a name.... unless you can think of a guy that would have been available at 12 who you would rather have than hill. If not, then like I said, it's pointless for him to give you a name.


Also, why would he give up his right to bitch? As it stands, the expert armchair GMs on this board only have to hope that ONE player from 12 to 60 becomes a great player. Then they can use their expert armchair GM hindsight to forever bitch and moan that we didn't take that one guy out of 49 players that would have been better than trading for George Hill.

Or, if they had any gonads at all, they could name the guy who they think we should have stuck around for at 12, instead of trading for Hill. I mean really, who GAF if #bern says they are wrong? Time will prove whether or not their armchair expertise proves to be right.

Therefore, anybody who is unhappy with the trade and trashing DL, grow a damn pair and name the guy you prefer. Otherwise, do us a favor and STFU.


P.S. I apologize to anyone who doesn't like the trade, but is willing to wait and see. My pissy attitude is directed at those who are trashing DL and crying like little babies because they were cheated out of their Christmas in June draft present.

Cheers!;)
 
Please go back to your magical forest and smurf with your smurf berries until you are smurfy again.
 
I wouldn't equate very active to going after the really high priced FA's.
One player I do think he'll target hard is Mirza Teletovic (sounds like a character out of Games of Thrones).

During the draft, I wrote down the phrase, "The Fall of Skal" in case it's useful someday.
 
Idk about that. Let's say I disagree. I think Favors ever improving and at age 26 entering his prime. I'd like to have Favors. I think he can destroy both the Cavs and Warriors. He's so underrated. Gobert will remain unplayable against certain lineups. They can just put him in PnR situations on the perimeter against the best shooters in the playoff. And Gobert cannot defend that. He can't switch. But against other slower lineups, he'll be a beast.

I mostly disagree with you. I think Favors is close to his peak, due to his physical ailments. Besides, at the 5, his lack of size negates some of his defensive prowess.
 
Well, it seemed like other GMs were able to do it. I just think his heart/mind wasn't into doing it. The reality is that Jazz have a full roster so adding more young guys this year wasn't as important to him probably. Jazz have three picks next year.

The annoying part of it is the fake "we tried" excuse. I'd rather just have him state the Jazz are moving to the next stage which is to bring in additional veteran help.
I'm more annoyed by your claim that his explanation was fake. You definitely don't know that.
 
I'm more annoyed by your claim that his explanation was fake. You definitely don't know that.

You're right maybe fake wasn't the right word, but the fact is that other GMs made deals. I am not upset about trading the pick because I like Hill. I just continue to hear the same old excuse that we tried. I realize that it is time to start adding solid veteran bench guys or better an elite FA so the Jazz can make the playoffs. I care more about production and less about we tried. I will just be a little skeptical until I see some results.

I liked the trade and I like the kid from Weber. I give DL a B-.

Two things I would like to see, clean up the roster a bit. Too many PGs. Get another solid veteran who can be a leader off the bench. My dream would be to sign a high profile FA. But I would be happy if DL just cleaned up the roster and got us some more bench help.
 
You're right maybe fake wasn't the right word, but the fact is that other GMs made deals. I am not upset about trading the pick because I like Hill. I just continue to hear the same old excuse that we tried. I realize that it is time to start adding solid veteran bench guys or better an elite FA so the Jazz can make the playoffs. I care more about production and less about we tried. I will just be a little skeptical until I see some results.

I liked the trade and I like the kid from Weber. I give DL a B-.

Two things I would like to see, clean up the roster a bit. Too many PGs. Get another solid veteran who can be a leader off the bench. My dream would be to sign a high profile FA. But I would be happy if DL just cleaned up the roster and got us some more bench help.
There were three draft day trades that involved a first round pick after #12. Here they are:

The Suns gave up 13 and 28 to the Kings for 8.
The Pacers gave up 20 and a future second for Thaddeus Young from the Nets.
The Hornets gave up 22 to the Kings for Marco Bellini.

Which of those picks which were moved do you think the Jazz should have grabbed, and what could they have given up for it? It's got to be better than what the seller of the pick got. It's a lot easier to sit on the sidelines and bitch that something didn't get done than it is to look at the actual facts and come up with a proposal that would work.
 
There were three draft day trades that involved a first round pick after #12. Here they are:

The Suns gave up 13 and 28 to the Kings for 8.
The Pacers gave up 20 and a future second for Thaddeus Young from the Nets.
The Hornets gave up 22 to the Kings for Marco Bellini.

Which of those picks which were moved do you think the Jazz should have grabbed, and what could they have given up for it? It's got to be better than what the seller of the pick got. It's a lot easier to sit on the sidelines and bitch that something didn't get done than it is to look at the actual facts and come up with a proposal that would work.

You sound very angry. There were plenty of moves in the second round. Perhaps instead of giving away our 12th pick we swapped it for the 21st and we give them a player or a second back next year. The fact is other GMs have made moves whether it was 3 or 10 it doesn't matter. I am not the GM so I don't have all the inside information that DL has.

It really isn't a big deal. Overall I think DL does a great job, I guess I'd rather just hear that there was no one they felt warrant a first round pick this year instead of we tried to get back into the draft but couldn't.
 
Back
Top