What's new

Does NAOS ruin every thread he posts in?

Does he?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 45.8%
  • No

    Votes: 7 29.2%
  • Cheese

    Votes: 6 25.0%

  • Total voters
    24
I voted yes :p
.
anigif_enhanced-26654-1400784928-1.gif
 
To the contrary, NAOS brings critical thinking to the threads he responds.

He certainly seems contrarian and likes to poke (don't we all), but the content of the posting is usually at least intellectually worthy of conversation. Hardly ruining the thread. Most everyone that posts here (sans maybe Colton) has a bias, a schtik, or an intention of deteriorating threads. So in that regard NAOS is merely part of the club.

I think most think his posting style is douchey (because it is) but his posts, on their face, is mostly solid.
And we're all douchey... Just not quite to his level.

Can people stop using the word "contrarian"? It's a ****ing message board, we are all disagreeing with somebody on every topic almost. People just label others as contrarians to take away credibility from the person who is opposing them.
 
Can people stop using the word "contrarian"? It's a ****ing message board, we are all disagreeing with somebody on every topic almost. People just label others as contrarians to take away credibility from the person who is opposing them.

Contrarian here is code word for someone who doesn't jump to the first conclusion possible.

FWIW, when I first joined I thought you (as pwnasaurus then) were purposefully, obnoxiously contrarian. Then I wisened up. I think the posters you'd care to discuss anything with all have as well.
 
Contrarian here is code word for someone who doesn't jump to the first conclusion possible.

FWIW, when I first joined I thought you (as pwnasaurus then) were purposefully, obnoxiously contrarian. Then I wisened up. I think the posters you'd care to discuss anything with all have as well.

co-signed
 
Can people stop using the word "contrarian"? It's a ****ing message board, we are all disagreeing with somebody on every topic almost. People just label others as contrarians to take away credibility from the person who is opposing them.

NO! That's not the way it is at all.



















Sorry, I had the unavoidable urge to disagree with you.
 
Can people stop using the word "contrarian"? It's a ****ing message board, we are all disagreeing with somebody on every topic almost. People just label others as contrarians to take away credibility from the person who is opposing them.

Contrarian here is code word for someone who doesn't jump to the first conclusion possible.

FWIW, when I first joined I thought you (as pwnasaurus then) were purposefully, obnoxiously contrarian. Then I wisened up. I think the posters you'd care to discuss anything with all have as well.

co-signed

Mother ****ing contrarians. The lot of ya.
 
Can people stop using the word "contrarian"? It's a ****ing message board, we are all disagreeing with somebody on every topic almost. People just label others as contrarians to take away credibility from the person who is opposing them.

Stop being contrarian to our use of contrarian.
 
Contrarian here is code word for someone who doesn't jump to the first conclusion possible.

FWIW, when I first joined I thought you (as pwnasaurus then) were purposefully, obnoxiously contrarian. Then I wisened up. I think the posters you'd care to discuss anything with all have as well.

No they haven't. Shut up.
 
Contrarian here is code word for someone who doesn't jump to the first conclusion possible.

FWIW, when I first joined I thought you (as pwnasaurus then) were purposefully, obnoxiously contrarian. Then I wisened up. I think the posters you'd care to discuss anything with all have as well.

Oh, and, ouch.
 
Back
Top