What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Well, I would say Mueller's team is the one who should clarify what exactly they are disputing. Take a close look at that sentencing memo, it essentially makes the same claim the Buzzfeed piece does, namely that Cohen lied to congress at the direction of 'Client 1.' It wouldn't have made its way into that agreement on Cohen's word alone.
Muller didn't publish a news piece about this. They are saying that the Buzzfeed piece is not 100% consistent with their findings. They don't have to clarify ****. Buzzfeed made claims about what the Muller team had, the Muller team said, "you don't have that exactly right."
 
Nice hit piece tho.

So we are supposed to trust the reporting of a self admitted mentally ill, drug addicted, lying, cheating and backstabbing man and his reporting on "facts"?

The character of this man doesnt alarm you at all? His past reporting scandals dont make you a little untrustworthy of him? Is this real life?

I dont care what he has got right either. There is clearly an issue with him. Even if he "got better" for a period of time there is always the high likelihood that he reverts back. Which is probably what is going on here.

I would say there is a reason he is at Buzzfeed, but good hell, he shouldn't even have a job there.
 
So we are supposed to trust the reporting of a self admitted mentally ill, drug addicted, lying, cheating and backstabbing man and his reporting on "facts"?

The character of this man doesnt alarm you at all? His past reporting scandals dont make you a little untrustworthy of him? Is this real life?

I dont care what he has got right either. There is clearly an issue with him. Even if he "got better" for a period of time there is always the high likelihood that he reverts back. Which is probably what is going on here.

I would say there is a reason he is at Buzzfeed, but good hell, he shouldn't even have a job there.
Did you quote me in that for a reason?
 
Muller didn't publish a news piece about this. They are saying that the Buzzfeed piece is not 100% consistent with their findings. They don't have to clarify ****. Buzzfeed made claims about what the Muller team had, the Muller team said, "you don't have that exactly right."
And yet as that sentencing memo makes clear, they do believe Cohen lied to congress on behalf of client one. Their statement today leaves the impression that isn't the case. So, yeah, it's kind of on them to clear that up imo.
 
The Cohen sentencing agreement does give the impression, at least, that Cohen lied "in accordance with Client 1's directives", and the statement from the Special Council's office yesterday does not deny the possibility that Trump told Cohen to lie.

The statement from the Special Council's office states that the Buzzfeed report was "not accurate". The two journalists have to have got something wrong. Both the chief editor of Buzzfeed, as well as Anthony Cormier, the non-controversial of the two journalists, were interviewed by phone on MSNBC last night. The editor stands by the story. Cormier stated that it was he, not Leopold, the journalist with the checkered past(although he was a finalist for a Pulitzer for his reporting) who confirmed what their two sources were saying. Without seeing the "documents", I'm not sure how that confirmation could be had, but, at any rate, that's their position at the moment.

We are not going to see Buzzfeed out their sources. And despite Buzzfeed's editor asking for clarification from the Special Council's office, we are not going to see further statements from Mueller's team.

It took 24 hours for Mueller's office to issue their rare rebuke of a published report. No doubt they spent some time ensuring those sources were not from within their own office. They have consistently been leak proof from the start.

I think the rebuke came, not just because the report was "not accurate". In April, 2018, following reports that Cohen had been in Prague, Mueller's office issued a statement telling the press to check their sources carefully because not every story being published was accurate. So Mueller's office has urged caution before.

I think yesterday's rebuttal was not just because Buzzfeed's report was not 100% accurate, though Buzzfeed says otherwise, but also due to the "impeachment hysteria" that overcame both journalists, and, I think more importantly, Democratic members of Congress. If the report was not completely accurate, Mueller would want to be sure nobody thought this leak originated in his office, and Mueller would not want "impeachment hysteria" overwhelming the House. If any conclusions of the report were accurate, such as Trump telling Cohen to lie, Mueller wants that info released on his terms, and his timetable.

I think the "impeachment hysteria" struck Mueller as too serious not to tamp down. Since it was based on a report containing inaccuracies, his office felt obligated to shoot it down. In time, we will see if any of it was accurate. In the meantime, it's a black eye for journalism, and Trump's team will use it going forward.
 
And yet as that sentencing memo makes clear, they do believe Cohen lied to congress on behalf of client one. Their statement today leaves the impression that isn't the case. So, yeah, it's kind of on them to clear that up imo.
Yeah, they'll clear it up when they produce their report.
 
I love how Donald and his gang are siding with Mueller. As if now suddenly Mueller is a truth teller. They spend 2 years bad mouthing him and now can’t stop praising him. Lol
 
This piece from the Washington Post this morning is a reminder of other published articles that were and are disputed, and still unverified by other news outlets, even as the original reporting continues to be defended by the sources. Also described is what was different about the Buzzfeed report, at least as Mueller may have viewed it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...09ed32-1b93-11e9-88fe-f9f77a3bcb6c_story.html

"The fact that the normally buttoned-up special counsel’s office felt compelled to issue a statement at all suggested that the story’s conclusions were too baldly stated and too consequential to stay unchallenged. In effect, Mueller’s office seemed to be saying that BuzzFeed went too far, and got some things wrong, though it did not say how or what.

In fact, what it didn’t say was important, too. It didn’t say that Mueller had no evidence that Trump had sought to influence Cohen — just that BuzzFeed’s description of such statements was inaccurate. Nor did it spell out which reported statements were inaccurate and in what way. Further, it offered no details about how BuzzFeed had mischaracterized any evidence that Mueller has collected".
 
Back
Top