What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
The new attorney general's son-in-law just got a job at the White House advising Trump on "legal matters."

Seriously, folks. You can't make this up.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/02/william-barr-son-in-law-white-house

No conflict of interest here. No siree.

I’m sure he joined the trump team just as his dad became AG because of his enormous credentials.

Deep state! Hillary, Comey, mueller, and McCabe are the real criminals! Why won’t the MSM report that? Like Benghazi and urine one? Comey and the FBI just waited until trump became president before they could take him
Out!

Did I cover all the stupid right wing talking pts yet?
 
This was posted by a Facebook friend. It's priceless, lol...


“Stolen from a friend of a friend. The best description of Trump I have ever read, from a Brit.

Someone on Quora asked, “Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?” Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote this magnificent response.

A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.

For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever.

I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humor is almost inhuman.

But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.

Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

And in Britain, we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.

Trump is neither plucky nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.

He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy or a greedy fat-cat.

He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a sniveling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us and most are.
* You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.

After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of ****. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumps of hair and scream in anguish:

‘My God… what… have… I… created?

If being a **** was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.”

http://jobsanger.blogspot.com/2019/02/british-writer-pens-best-description-of.html
 
This was posted by a Facebook friend. It's priceless, lol...


“Stolen from a friend of a friend. The best description of Trump I have ever read, from a Brit.

Someone on Quora asked, “Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?” Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote this magnificent response.

A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.

For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever.

I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humor is almost inhuman.

But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.

Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

And in Britain, we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.

Trump is neither plucky nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.

He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy or a greedy fat-cat.

He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a sniveling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us and most are.
* You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.

After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of ****. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumps of hair and scream in anguish:

‘My God… what… have… I… created?

If being a **** was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.”

Did not really read, but I wanted to point out that the Brits voted for Brexit, which is led by their version of the Trumpers. They have no leg to stand on.
 
Did not really read, but I wanted to point out that the Brits voted for Brexit, which is led by their version of the Trumpers. They have no leg to stand on.

Not all of them voted for Brexit. There's enough who didn't to be able to stand on one leg, methinks, lol....
 
Not all of them voted for Brexit. There's enough who didn't to be able to stand on one leg, methinks, lol....

52% of them voted for it. Less than 50% of Americans voted for Trump. "What the British hate about Trump" sounds snobby. It's like saying "What Americans hate about Boris Johnson". Nothing in particular. We have one of our own.
 
52% of them voted for it. Less than 50% of Americans voted for Trump. "What the British hate about Trump" sounds snobby. It's like saying "What Americans hate about Boris Johnson". Nothing in particular. We have one of our own.

OK, fair enough then. I just thought it was funny, and got a much needed laugh out of it at the time....
 
I think Stone is a pro at flipping a narrative, and he fully understands the strategy settled on, by the president, and the inner circle of defenders, is to make the story line a deep state effort to take down the president. The Times just published a description of the evolution of this strategy. It doesn't resemble the strategy an innocent man would adopt.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/19/us/politics/trump-investigations.html

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/02/19/...ew-york-times-russia-investigation/index.html

"The episode was among the first of multiple ham-handed efforts by the president to carry out a dual strategy: publicly casting the Russia story as an overblown hoax and privately trying to contain the investigation's reach."
 
Have to wonder how much of Mueller's report will make its way to we the people. Trump is going to run for reelection with two dominant themes: "finish the wall" will be the new rally chant. And the narrative that the president is the target of a "deep state" effort to remove him from office, a "coup" by our intelligence agencies, will be pounded home. Trump's propaganda organs, like Fox News, are driving that narrative right now, in the wake of Andrew McCabe's disclosures, and Trump supporters are buying into it.

From my perspective, it's clear that the investigation into Russian election interference had already raised concern regarding Trump's relations to the Russians well before the Comey firing. McCabe confirmed that fact. Firing Comey simply brought those concerns to a head. The actions of Trump in bragging to the Russian ambassador and Foreign Minister in the Oval Office following that firing, created a situation where it would have been irresponsible for our intelligence agencies to not open a counterintelligence investigation of Trump.

Fox calls it an attempted coup. Nope, it was our Justice Department, and our intelligence agencies, acting responsibly, acting to protect, not undermine, our democracy, acting as they should when confronted with the facts Trump and his campaign presented to them. And the gang of 8 was informed, Republicans knew this counterintelligence investigation was happening, and they did not cry "deep state!!" at the time.

This was no attempted coup. This was our system working as it should, to protect our democracy. Lindsey Graham and his ilk are complicit to the authoritarian tendencies of Trump. It is they who act against our democracy, they who should be ashamed of themselves.

As McCabe admitted, at the end of the clip below, "it's possible" our president is a Russian asset. Amazing to hear a high ranking official of the FBI say such a thing, but it's something I have suspected going back to the summer of 2016 and the election campaign. I believe these dueling narratives will dominate the 2020 election.

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...l-national-security-threat-america-ncna972826

 
Last edited:
Even Judge Napolitano is saying the Times story, if true, demonstrates "corrupt intent" on Trump's part:

https://www.salon.com/2019/02/20/fo...rt-demonstrates-donald-trumps-corrupt-intent/

And Trump attacks the Times as "the enemy of the people". What a shame that Trump supporters are unable to see through Trump's strategy of demonizing any investigative journalism that is way too close to the truth for his comfort:



The New York Times and the leftist media is the enemy of the American people. The socialist propaganda is a problem.

Why do leftists try so hard to change this country anyways? Why not just move to any other place in the world where their idea of a utopia is already setup? Just move,...and enjoy
 
Back
Top