What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Is the New York times news or opinions?

They publish both. And it will say right at the top of the page. It will say "opinion" if that is what it is. Duh!!

And the long Times article I posted in this thread a few pages ago is investigative journalism. Duh!!
 
If there even is a "report", the conclusion of Mueller's role in investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, is, at the least, likely to trigger a prolonged struggle of the press, the public, Congress, the Justice Department, and Trump regarding that "report" and how much of it the public will ever see. Right up to the Supreme Court perhaps. Meanwhile, spin off investigations from Mueller's work, that may imperil Trump even more then the Russian interference investigation, as well as investigations by various House committees, will continue.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/02/21/politics/donald-trump-robert-mueller-report-questions/index.html
 
pa8zpnp2wrh21.jpg
 
Here, let me help you since you want to avoid using the actual definition of propaganda.

View attachment 6804 View attachment 6805 View attachment 6806

Thanks for posting the definition, of which a news paper allowing people to share their opinions on an issue does not match it's definition at all.

I did get a good chuckle out of this one though. But your opinion on media makes more sense to me now. You just don't understand it. I guess people do fear what they don't know.
 
Thanks for posting the definition, of which a news paper allowing people to share their opinions on an issue does not match it's definition at all.

I did get a good chuckle out of this one though. But your opinion on media makes more sense to me now. You just don't understand it. I guess people do fear what they don't know.

So you agree. The New York Times publishes an exorbitant amount of socialist opinions. Frame it however you want. Its propaganda. Its meant to influence the minds of the public. Such as yours. Which is why you defend it so hard. Its become a part of you. Its changed you. So you protect it like its your weed stash.(was going to go with baby, but we know how libs feel about babies)
 
Next time you read the Times, count the number of times it provides pro business/ capitalist views and then count the number of times it touts the government / socialism. Report back with your findings.

That's not really fair. They do have an opinion section. I recommend requesting a compendium of articles, at least 40, citing and indexing all of them.
 
Just stop. I’m conservative but this whole libs hate kids stuff just shows you’ve been brainwashed and isolated. Start with humility and get off your naive moral high horse.
Ya I'm pro-life but I think a woman and her family should have the right to choose. I don't think everyone has to be pro life just cause I am.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Ya I'm pro-life but I think a woman and her family should have the right to choose. I don't think everyone has to be pro life just cause I am.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

I think you are actually probably a decent person but just really confused because you want everyone around here to like you.

Make no mistake about it. These libs around here wont think twice bout murdering a baby.

Abortion is a disgusting human act. Anything other than the baby had to be aborted to save the life of the female or she was raped, is down right disgusting. But lazy no responsibility libs will do it just to save their social life.

You should really rethink just how ok you are with liberalism.
 
Next time you read the Times, count the number of times it provides pro business/ capitalist views and then count the number of times it touts the government / socialism. Report back with your findings.


I already made that report. Read a few pages back.
 
Back
Top