What's new
By:

Donovan, other players considering not playing

Listen, Donovan has not said he doesn’t want to be here, but I think he’s understandably frustrated with some things, and you know what we should be better. We should help our communities grow. I would also love to see Donovan help this community grow as well. There’s no concrete evidence he doesn’t plan on being here. And obviously if he doesn’t want to be here you’ll have to trade him, but it’s going to be devastating to the franchise for a long time in more ways than just simply losing Don, which is a huge loss not only for the team but Salt Lake City in general.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Like hell it is. WTF kind of Logic is that. I’m going out on a lim and saying a trade like this gives us a minimum of three years of extreme mediocrity, with a good chance for more.
Click to expand...

Try to think of a better realistic package than that. Think before you speak.
 
Point is we have time. IMO Mitchell would love to win it all here. As long as the jazz org is trying to surround Mitchell as they’ve proven he will play out his contract.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Lol. There’s got to be a million and one better options, but the best option is to keep Mitchell till he actually says I want out.
Click to expand...

Dude are you ok? Literally said if we decided to trade him that’s the best realistic package. Key word "decided".
 
Avery Bradley wont be playing when the NBA restarts. He's got a 6 y/o son 'with a history of struggling to recover from respiratory illness'
 
So basically, the Lakers will be able to sign a replacement player for Bradley for the prorated minimum, no bird rights accrue from these types of deals.
 
Any chance Howard also doesn’t play for the Lakers? God, I’d love if they didn’t win it all.
 
I still think we won’t have an NBA Finals champion, World Series champion, or NFL champion this year (February)... no idea about the NHL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top