What's new
By:

Down with cj

freakazoid said:
I can't. Obviously I already admitted that logcrap69 and lograddderp are different posters who never existed.

That was the old daze. You are right, and I am wrong.\\


What else do you want?
Click to expand...

Whatever form of back-pedal works for you I guess.


Peace.
 
CJ is the man. We'd be boned without him, and I'm dead serious about that. He's our only player who has the athleticism and skill and most importantly height to break down the defense and score anytime. He adds a totally different dynamic to the system and is the closest thing we have to a Hornacek.

Maybe Hayward and Evans will do it eventually, but the jury is still out.
 
Cj played good and hes usually always the sub of the game for a reason. He's our best player on the bench.
 
DonM said:
Being a new poster who has read the posts for awhile, I'm kinda confused by the CJ threads. First he was junk, then he was the second coming of Adrian Dantley, and now he sucks again. Sounds a little schitzo ....
Click to expand...

Confused by those confused over the different reactions to a player's performance in what are, after all, different games. Players aren't always great. Or, thankfully, they're not always crap.

And at some point you ought to get used to exaggerations -- a lot of hyperbole in sports, and is to be expected from fanatics who bother to post online.
 
Last edited:
LogGrad98 said:
Funny how when CJ is part of a larger losing effort the argument is "everyone sucked" and when he just does poorly the argument is "everyone has a bad game". And his good games are just too far apart.

I have seen enough bad games from him, time to find out what Hayward can do.
Click to expand...

He played 9 whole minutes that game. He must be the whole reason they lost.
 
LogGrad98 said:
CJ had a nice game tonight, at least from the box score (working game nights sucks). 6 of 11 is good. 4 TO is not great, but he filled up the stat line other than that pretty nicely.
Click to expand...

At least 2 of those were offensive fouls while attacking the basket. I'll take those kind of turnovers by a player anytime. One of those was called a block and the other ref overturned it. Though it did look like one of them was an offensive foul the 2nd one looked like the player was still sliding over and CJ barely hit him(of course Brad Miller fell down like it was shaq hitting him though). Either way getting fouls while attacking the basket and forcing the refs to make that call is not necessarily a bad play.
 
gregbroncs said:
He played 9 whole minutes that game. He must be the whole reason they lost.
Click to expand...

Didn't say that, and I was not talking about any specific game, that is just the general response of the die-hard apologists.
 
gregbroncs said:
At least 2 of those were offensive fouls while attacking the basket. I'll take those kind of turnovers by a player anytime. One of those was called a block and the other ref overturned it. Though it did look like one of them was an offensive foul the 2nd one looked like the player was still sliding over and CJ barely hit him(of course Brad Miller fell down like it was shaq hitting him though). Either way getting fouls while attacking the basket and forcing the refs to make that call is not necessarily a bad play.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top