What's new
By:

Duncan > Malone?

Love Karl but Duncan is better than Malone with or without rings and it has nothing to do with Sloan or Pop. Duncan is simply better. And the PF versus C thing is complete semantics.
 
gomretat said:
Love Karl but Duncan is better than Malone with or without rings and it has nothing to do with Sloan or Pop. Duncan is simply better. And the PF versus C thing is complete semantics.
Click to expand...

The PF C thing is not complete semantics. From day one Duncan was lucky enough to play with a second center and be allowed to create a mismatch. He is great, but if he was forced to play C and paired with, say, Milsap as his PF for the past 5 years things would not be the same.
 
Growlor said:
The PF C thing is not complete semantics. From day one Duncan was lucky enough to play with a second center and be allowed to create a mismatch. He is great, but if he was forced to play C and paired with, say, Milsap as his PF for the past 5 years things would not be the same.
Click to expand...

that's idiotic. from day 1, duncan was already better than aging drob. nothing you can do when you are that fluid, smooth, and run like gazelle. and dude was workaholic.

and duncan's best years came well after drob retired. and duncan played with bunch of scrubs too. rasho for ex. duncan will always be the same. this dude stayed in college for 4 years, and came in polished as hell. he was surest thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top