ENES KANTER V.S JONAS VALANCIUNAS The difference between the two players- LOOK :)

[Chad Feldheimer]

So one guy who is 6'10-11

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Actually, 2,10 meters is roughly 6-9.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

They have Kanter being roughly 6'8. I'm guessing these are without shoes on measurements.

 

[Chad Feldheimer]

Actually, 2,10 meters is roughly 6-9.

draftexpress has Jonas as 6-11. so who knows.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

draftexpress has Jonas as 6-11. so who knows.

Well yeah, these are the U18 tournaments, so they where probably 17 years old.

 

[Dr. Jones]

Aren't these measurements about two years old?

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I think that is why Kanter was able to dominate like he did. Valacunias has had more trouble growing into his body, where Kanter has always had a very strong frame for his age.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Which would also explain what someone like Koufus dominated the same tournament. He was also physically mature for his age.

 

[turkishdelight]

2.03 m 6.8

2.08 m 6.10

 

[Chad Feldheimer]

So this proves that Kanter is better at dominating weak competition. Now what?

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

2.03 m 6.8

2.08 m 6.10

Not according to google converter.

 

[cowhide]

Yea because there are some many 6' 11" guys in the NCAA. How many guys from the NCAA make it in the NBA? So the ones that do are they also playing inferior competition in college. The NCAA is water down basketball too so should Knight's stats count.

Guys he dominated his age group. Yes it isn't American basketball but when he went up against Americans his own age he dominated them. So if you are going to discount his achievements then you have to discount all the NCAA guys too. The reality is draft is all quess work. No one knows who is going to be great in the NBA especially in this draft were there are few sure things.

By those stats Kanter is better and right now he is the best player available who knows which player will be better in three years.