Not saying I condone any of ESPN's decision making, but it's not like they become this mega-empire by mistake. They obviously know what they're doing, so who are we to try and decide how they should run their company? They've been doing something right all these years - and that's manipulating the idiotic public into forming what they should be interested in sporting wise as well as what they should talk about.
There's a tipping point to that kind of hubris. After all, the NFL is the most popular sport in America. Clearly they know what they're doing right?
The Ombudsman has weighed in.
https://espn.go.com/blog/ombudsman/post/_/id/462/strengths-weaknesses-and-suspensions
This regular column is hard to find (buried?) and not frequently updated, but is usually a good read.
https://espn.go.com/blog/ombudsman/
This is a challenging column. I agree with some portions of it, but saying there's insufficient evidence to call Goodell a liar is, in my opinion, ludicrous. If he didn't know what was on the tape then he was willfully ignorant. If he didn't watch it, it's because he didn't want to watch it. Even if he hadn't seen it, what happened was so abundantly clear that the initial punishment was ludicrous anyway.
Obviously Simmons is an arrogant and challenging personality. That doesn't bother me on face (imagine that) and I understand that it rubs some people the wrong way. This was not the right time or place to go after Simmons. The issue at stake here is a little too clear.