1. Mudiay played a great 5 minutes last game, but that doesn't change the fact he is averaging 4.0 TOV/36 and shooting just 23% from 3. Larsen overstating Mudiay's case a little there. But the Jazz haven't been planning on using Exum as a PG, or so the rumor goes, so Mudiay won't be impacted anyway.
1. Mudiay played a great 5 minutes last game, but that doesn't change the fact he is averaging 4.0 TOV/36 and shooting just 23% from 3. Larsen overstating Mudiay's case a little there. But the Jazz haven't been planning on using Exum as a PG, or so the rumor goes, so Mudiay won't be impacted anyway.
2. Ingles hasn't been playing well, but should still get 25-30 minutes? Wouldn't hurt to rest Joe a little, plenty of posters have been saying he looks tired. But still wouldn't want to take too many minutes from him as he could break out of his slump any time.
3. Niang averages 9 minutes per game, so there's someone you could sit and give his minutes to Exum right there.
4. I want to see Exum play at the same time as Tony Bradley and set him up for easy buckets, just to make Kyoto's head explode.
Answer: no one. Dante shouldn't play unless there is an injury, foul trouble or a blowout.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Before the season started I read that Dante is going to play as the wing from now. Someone from Jazz staff was saying something that it's going to show that Dante is "more complete player now, not just PG" or something of that sort.
Can someone with more basketball knowledge explain me the sense of it?
Is it not just admitting that Dante doesn't really have the necessary vision to run the point? Or we just need him as universal defender? Is not the wing who can't shoot less useful than PG who can't do it either? Or maybe...tadam!.. it's to show that he can play multiple positions to bump his trade value up?