What's new

Faith fails to protect idiot from snake bites.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edsDrqfDVKY

I suggest you watch the video with Richard Dawkins and noble prize winning physician who is an atheist named Steven Weinberg in which he says "the universe is obviously fine tuned." Stephen Hawkins who is also an atheist states that the universe is fine tuned 1 in a hundred thousand million million. That is a greater number of atoms in the entire universe.

I can point you into many non atheist physicians if you want who say the same thing (Gerald Schroeder, Paul Davies).

Don't worry bro, you can close your ears with your hands and shout "the universe isn't fine tuned, the universe isn't fine tuned" over and over again loudly and ignore the facts. The only cosmologist that says the Universe isn't fine tuned that I know of is Victor J Stenger (who isn't even famous for his physics but famous for being an atheist, the same thing with Richard Dawkins about biology) while even most atheist cosmologists agree the universe is fine tuned but say we just don't know why.

Look at that! Our village idiot now believes that we must take the opinion of that scientist because HE IS A SCIENTIST. That does not apply to widely accepted scientific theories the village idiot fails to understand. Only things that make him happy! How adorable.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edsDrqfDVKY

I suggest you watch the video with Richard Dawkins and noble prize winning physician who is an atheist named Steven Weinberg in which he says "the universe is obviously fine tuned." Stephen Hawkins who is also an atheist states that the universe is fine tuned 1 in a hundred thousand million million. That is a greater number of atoms in the entire universe.

I can point you into many non atheist physicians if you want who say the same thing (Gerald Schroeder, Paul Davies).

Don't worry bro, you can close your ears with your hands and shout "the universe isn't fine tuned, the universe isn't fine tuned" over and over again loudly and ignore the facts. The only cosmologist that says the Universe isn't fine tuned that I know of is Victor J Stenger (who isn't even famous for his physics but famous for being an atheist, the same thing with Richard Dawkins about biology) while even most atheist cosmologists agree the universe is fine tuned but say we just don't know why.

You are quite effective at making people want to become non believers. It must do your God proud to know you are driving others from Him.
 
You are quite effective at making people want to become non believers. It must do your God proud to know you are driving others from Him.

This.

Black - where are you from? This may be more of a cultural divide than ... drawing a blank as to how to say the rest nicely. So, where you from?
 
I thought it said right under my name where I am from...

I list 4 notable scientists supporting the idea that the universe is fine tuned including their reasons why and a video and everybody is now snapping out on me. The same response happens when you play piano in a room full of monkey's. Unfortunately most sport fans are hillbilly rednecks and that's who many of you guys are.
 
If we only evolved things that were necessary then why do humans still have tailbones?

Animals and humans alike, have characteristics that aren't always useful. Evolution isn't this perfect instant process that CJ is suggesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought it said right under my name where I am from...

I list 4 notable scientists supporting the idea that the universe is fine tuned including their reasons why and a video and everybody is now snapping out on me. The same response happens when you play piano in a room full of monkey's. Unfortunately most sport fans are hillbilly rednecks and that's who many of you guys are.

Peoples reaction to you has nothing to do with you listing names. It has to do with the way you present your arguement and your overall ****ty attitude.
 
Sometimes it's easy to believe that US is all New York, Florida, and the West Coast. There are parts of the South(though this business actually took place in WVA) that may as well be in the 19th century.

Floriduh is on the list of sophisticated Americans?
 
Obviously that's not true. There is no conceivable paradigm for existence that would not be based on "laws". Those laws are just formal description of what we see. Very often it turns out to be a false description. Take Newton's laws of gravity for an example. The formulation works. You can indeed describe the force of gravity using an inverse square law and get pretty accurate results. But the "law" turned out not to be a law at all. Einstein turned the whole idea on its head and showed that gravity was not a force at all, but an inevitable manifestation of motion in curved space. General Relativity gives more accurate results, but even that may eventually be overturned. But that's neither here nor there.

Newton's law ain't a law, but Darwin's crackpot theory is the very essence of "science," and can't be questioned. You are more faith filled on Darwinism than any God believer I've met.
 
"% who agree that evolution is the best explanation for the origins of human life on earth"

It's all in how you phrase the question. For example, I wouldn't answer "yes" to that particular phrasing myself, even though I'm a scientist and (to a large extent) a believer in evolution.

I don't understand how a Mormon reconciles "created in God's image" with "a series of random mutations"
 
Newton's law ain't a law, but Darwin's crackpot theory is the very essence of "science," and can't be questioned.

It can be and has been questioned by scientists. It's been revised, altered, and extended. It's no more accepted on faith than gravity.
 
Back
Top