What's new

Fesenko close to deal with Ukrainian team

And who are the Ostertags and Fesenkos that Thibodeau turned into great players with his coaching "insight"? Or for that matter Popovich?
Given that he's spent one year as coach, and turned them into a top seed in that single year, his performance is immune from your pathetic attempt at justifying yourself.

If anything, Sloan has turned more second round picks into decent-looking role players in the Jazz system. When they leave the Jazz and go play in another system, they look like crap.
You mean Paul Millsap? You're now contradicting yourself. In your previous post, you pointed out that coaches don't have much impact on player development. Which is it, then?

But yet Sloan is the idiot because Fesenko turned out to be the Gomar Pyle of the Jazz rather than the Hakeem Olajuwon you envisoned him to be. You should be a sitcom writer in your next life.
You're catching on, because even in his state of underachieving potential--without any coaching involvement in his progress--Fes was poorly utilized. And that has little to do with development and everything to do with the difference between coaching with intelligence and coaching with something other than what is pegged against the seat of a tractor.
 
The coaching staff spends hundreds of hours a year developing players and Fes was no exception.
Care to cite some specifics on that, gomertat?

My understanding that he did receive some attention, and there were signs of improvement, but then Fes's PT was reduced to even further crumbs, stunting any further progress, despite the dire need for a legit [backup] center (and the need for some semblance of interior D).

My #1 criticism regarding this situation has always been that the coaches didn't give him enough court experience to refine his skills, even when the players that were on the court were sucking wind. Court experience is essential--for elite players and role players alike--to develop. Sloan did the same thing to Kirilenko post-2004--not that AK required experience, but that he had proven to be more valuable then how he was used. On the flip side, Sloan's obsession with lunchpail players ("character guys") caused him to vastly overuse Derek Fisher at the 2, even when he was getting pwned (and an alternative was available). He overused Collins at times when Tree was completely inept (and an alternative was available). Consider the overuse of Bell last season. I could go on.

In other words, this poor use of players is far from exclusive to Fesenko, and stems largely from a poor strategy and policy in predicting and maintaing performance. Sloan preferred much more to growl a bit before (and during) games and then blame the players (most of the time) if things didn't go their way.
 
Back
Top