What's new
By:

Fire Corbin or Keep Him?

Should we Fire Corbin or Keep Him?

  • Fire Him -- He's doesn't manage his players well

    Votes: 68 82.9%

  • Keep Him -- He needs more time to learn on the job

    Votes: 14 17.1%
  • Total voters
    82
fishonjazz said:
I get your point though hartsock about not being able to rely on favors for a bucket at the end of games..... that is why you have 4 other guys on the court.

I think you CAN rely on favors to help get stops at the end of games however, maybe stops just are not important to some people though.
Click to expand...

Stops are very important, but was favors going to help poor rotations by Carrol, Burks, Hayward and Foye? Was it going to get a hand up on Ellis, Jennings, and Reddick hitting 3's? The Bucks were scoring pretty well with Favors on the court also. I think Kanter and Sap played just fine at the defensive end and were both better offensive threats.
 
Hartsock said:
Stops are very important, but was favors going to help poor rotations by Carrol, Burks, Hayward and Foye? Was it going to get a hand up on Ellis, Jennings, and Reddick hitting 3's? The Bucks were scoring pretty well with Favors on the court also. I think Kanter and Sap played just fine at the defensive end and were both better offensive threats.
Click to expand...

Umm.... im talking about the last 2 years, not the last game.
 
I think we all have good points on both sides of the discussion.... the major difference is that i choose to point out the Good things about favors, while other point out the bad.

I Also think that his good outwiegh his bad :)
 
fishonjazz said:
I think we all have good points on both sides of the discussion.... the major difference is that i choose to point out the Good things about favors, while other point out the bad.

I Also think that his good outwiegh his bad :)
Click to expand...

I agree his good outweighs his bad, maybe I'm just focusing on the Bucks game since this thread is about Firing Corbin and not about Favors over the last few years. I would rather have Favors play than Sap or Jefferson next year. Let them both go.
 
Hartsock said:
I agree his good outweighs his bad, maybe I'm just focusing on the Bucks game since this thread is about Firing Corbin and not about Favors over the last few years. I would rather have Favors play than Sap or Jefferson next year. Let them both go.
Click to expand...

Now we are talkin.

Also i would not hate on jefferson very much (maybe not at all) or corbin if jarron collins and francisco elson were the back ups to paul and al..... and watson, and marvin williams were not staring over players that are better than them.
 
fishonjazz said:
Now we are talkin.

Also i would not hate on jefferson very much (maybe not at all) or corbin if jarron collins and francisco elson were the back ups to paul and al..... and watson, and marvin williams were not staring over players that are better than them.
Click to expand...

Why are people killing Watson though, everyone knows he sucks, but the other 2 pgs were hurt and even if Burks starts he cant play 48 minutes.
 
Hartsock said:
Why are people killing Watson though, everyone knows he sucks, but the other 2 pgs were hurt and even if Burks starts he cant play 48 minutes.
Click to expand...

I dont go after watson.... i just think (like most teams) that you should start your best players (burks over watson, demarre over williams) so that when the crappy ones like watson have to play (like you said, burks cant go 48 minutes) they can go against the other teams back ups.
This issue lies with the coach IMO.
 
Hartsock said:
Stops are very important, but was favors going to help poor rotations by Carrol, Burks, Hayward and Foye? Was it going to get a hand up on Ellis, Jennings, and Reddick hitting 3's? The Bucks were scoring pretty well with Favors on the court also. I think Kanter and Sap played just fine at the defensive end and were both better offensive threats.
Click to expand...

Yeah and they played 17 minutes straight ... you think they might need a blow, plus Favors was playing better than either of them, and he does protect the rim better. Hartsock, I think you ought to change your name to HARDHEAD
 
Actually i lied,.... i do go after watson..... And i think burks should start and play 35 minutes or so, and then TINSLEY should come off the bench, not watson.

If tinsley and mo are both hurt then i have no problem with watson getting 10-15 minutes as the backup point guard
 
Here's the thing: If Corbin said after the game that he should've put Favors back in because he had been playing so well, and that he probably made a mistake, considering we lost the game, then I might say, well, the guy is owning up and taking responsbility. Then I'd have more respect for him, because that's what Jerry used to do. But no, he says he made the right decision -- what a diss on Favors that was. And that's what p'od me the most his failure to respect Favors.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
Here's the thing: If Corbin said after the game that he should've put Favors back in because he had been playing so well, and that he probably made a mistake, considering we lost the game, then I might say, well, the guy is owning up and taking responsbility. Then I'd have more respect for him, because that's what Jerry used to do. But no, he says he made the right decision -- what a diss on Favors that was. And that's what p'od me the most his failure to respect Favors.
Click to expand...

The game was lost on a missed FT. It was the right choice.

Both Kanter and Millsap scored the majority of our points. Does Favors or anyone makeup for those points? Who knows?

We do know the choice Corbin made put us in a high % chance to win the game if 1 of 3 missed ft's in crunch time were made.
 
Im personally not just talking about the Bucks game. It's true they killed us from outside late in the game on decently defended 3 pt shots.
They just hit some tough shots. I don't recall us giving up any late easy baskets or in overtime.

This isn't just about one game though...
 
Revolution 9 said:
Im personally not just talking about the Bucks game. It's true they killed us from outside late in the game on decently defended 3 pt shots.
They just hit some tough shots. I don't recall us giving up any late easy baskets or in overtime.

This isn't just about one game though...
Click to expand...


You don't remember Carroll losing Reddick on a screen for a wide, wide open 3 pointer? He actually did it twice in OT, luckily Reddick missed one of them.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
You don't remember Carroll losing Reddick on a screen for a wide, wide open 3 pointer? He actually did it twice in OT, luckily Reddick missed one of them.
Click to expand...

I didn't see the second one, only the shot he hit. Still he recovered and came at him. All the shots I saw were contested.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top