What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

I agree with you about shot creation for others, but the Jazz offense floated around top 10 for a large part of the season and finished middle of the pack. The only thing bottom 5 about the Jazz offense is the assist statistics. It makes sense considering the group of players playing PG last season. I believe fast break points were a struggle for this Jazz team as well.

On offense we need a PG who can run an offense and create shots for others (Exum is our guy) and we need spacing like you said.

Why settle for top 10, top 5 defense? Why not be the best defense? The 2012-2014 Pacers, Thib's Bulls teams, even last years Spurs. That's the model the Jazz should be following and frankly we are lacking perimeter defenders. The 121.3 DRtg in the last 5 minutes is eye-popping. They are in the company of the Suns, Lakers, 76ers, and Pelicans.

Which stats are you using to bring you to the top 10 rating? Or "middle of the pack"? Also zero ppl in the world know if Exum is our guy or not. He was contact-hesitant before tearing his ACL trying to draw fouls. I'm still high on him but don't act like it isn't a huge question mark
 
And Stauskas scored 70/76 from 3 in 5 minutes, so what? That's not basketball. The question is what he will be able to do with NBA-athletes guarding him.

What would you give Boston for #3?

Totally a defferent work out. Stauskas was shooting from a static spot. Murray had to shootfrom a defferent spot each time. Big difference.
 
3rd best player in the draft couldn't get a super talented Vanderbilt team to win games? LMAO

He's not a leading player. He's also a young PG, PG's take time.

And honestly, who cares? The best player in the draft couldn't get his team to the tournament. It's a crappy draft. It's a team sport. Vandy isn't as talented as you think they are. I could go on and on, but I'll keep it short, your point is stupid and means practically nothing.
 
Which stats are you using to bring you to the top 10 rating? Or "middle of the pack"? Also zero ppl in the world know if Exum is our guy or not. He was contact-hesitant before tearing his ACL trying to draw fouls. I'm still high on him but don't act like it isn't a huge question mark

Offensive Rating.

Exum is a question for sure but he's our guy until he succeeds or fails really.
 
He's not a leading player. He's also a young PG, PG's take time.

And honestly, who cares? The best player in the draft couldn't get his team to the tournament. It's a crappy draft. It's a team sport. Vandy isn't as talented as you think they are. I could go on and on, but I'll keep it short, your point is stupid and means practically nothing.
It means something.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
No he wouldn't. And then if he isn't good offensively those elite guys you mentioned don't have to work on that end to guard Gobert, favors, exum, Hayward, and luwawu. Pack the paint like crazy and double hayward. Piece of cake.

He can hit 3s. He looks like a better shooting prospect than Burks. Luwawu wouldnt be playing with Hayward or the 1st unit anyway.
Luwawu and Lyles cannot be left alone from the outside. Please pack the paint against those guys.
 
I'd be very happy with any of Ellenson, Poeltl, Luwawu or Korkmaz. If you end up with one of the wings, try to trade up for Diamond Stone. Still think he's a solid talent that is being slept on and underrated. Throw some 2nd round picks and cash to move up and steal him. Then send him to the Stars to develop. Win-win.
 
3rd best player in the draft couldn't get a super talented Vanderbilt team to win games? LMAO
Did lsu win lots of games? I hear they have a good player.
 
Yeah and guess what? Because of it there are a lot of pro Ingram people.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Oh we disagree then. I don't think there are a lot of pro Ingram people because lsu didn't win very much, I think there are a lot of pro Ingram people because Ingram is a really good nba prospect.
 
Oh we disagree then. I don't think there are a lot of pro Ingram people because lsu didn't win very much, I think there are a lot of pro Ingram people because Ingram is a really good nba prospect.
Are you daft? Did I say that was the only reason?

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top