Everywhere?
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
You think he'll be superior to Giannis at playing all 5 positions?? I don't. (I've got Ingram as the best over-sized SF prospect since Giannis, I think he's a better prospect - just watch him shoot..)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JexQRwN4HEs
I'm weary about those LSU measurements, I don't think Ben's a legit 6'10 in shoes. A 7' wingspan and 9' standing reach are probably overstated too.
Are his previous measurements not in Julius Randle territory???
Playing Ben at SF next to Favors and Gobert,puts a ton of pressure on the guards to space the floor -
I don't really see how that's balanced..
The team would be doomed to the middle of the pack or worse from the 3pt line... Obviously that displaces Hayward to the 2 a bit more too.
Playing him at PF makes more sense for the Jazz,
IMO his games best suited for the wing though...
At PF for the Jazz, would the rim protection and rebounding still be elite?
Age is also a factor, and IMO the Jazz seem to draft young - Seems their all about player development.. Brandon Ingram's 14 months younger than Ben, He's also much less of a finished product IMO.
Skal for intance is a much more seamless fit, he fits the scheme and everything they try to do with the bigs, he can actually hit mid-range shots with much more consistency than any of our current bigs, plus he'd only add to the defensive and rebounding advantages.. Like I said in the last post,
Simmons would totally overhaul the teams dynamic - I kinda like the idea of keeping this blueprint, they just need to cut out some weak links, and replace them with huge talent upgrades, and that should be enough to tip the scales..