What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

Skal seems eerily similar to Perry Jones III for me. I haven't seen many cases of guys who are soft in college becoming studs at the next level. I'd pass.

This. I have zero interero. We're already soft as ****. Why would we want to get the biggest ***** in this draft?
 
Exum-Mack-Neto
Hood-Burks
Hayward-Luwawu
Favors-Lyles-Anunoby
Gobert-Withey

That is an insanely talented roster.
 
What's the opposite of bandwagon?

I knew who this was going to be about before I ever clicked.

I don't see why Cy hates him so much. He has flaws for sure but he can't be slower defensively than ingles. Guy can shoot pass and rebound. I'd rather have Luwawu but he's going top ten.

If also rather have Valentine than Korkmaz... Mostly cuz his first name is Furkan and I'm sure he can't be good with that first name.
 
Probably because he can't go left, he can't create separation, he can't defend, and he can't finish at the rim. Those are the main points.
 
I don't see why Cy hates him so much. He has flaws for sure but he can't be slower defensively than ingles. Guy can shoot pass and rebound. I'd rather have Luwawu but he's going top ten.

If also rather have Valentine than Korkmaz... Mostly cuz his first name is Furkan and I'm sure he can't be good with that first name.

"He can't be slower defensively than Ingles" might be the worst selling point I've heard.
 
Still need more shooters.

This.

We need at least one lights out shooter. Booker could have been that guy, but having a versatile stretch-4 was a need, too.

Hield and Murray fit the bill, but I'm not sure what it would take to move up for them or if it would be worth it.

Furkan looks like he could be a versatile sharp shooter in our range.
 
Back
Top