What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

I recall how curry didn't have enough size, wasn't athletic enough, and couldn't defend and therefore shouldn't be a top 5 pick.

Sounds familiar

Yeah, but these are the same arguments Jimmer apologists were making. For every Lillard/Curry, you can find a dozen Jimmers/Morrisons.

I like Hield, but I don't think he's going to be a star, per se. I think he has good enough length and athleticism--combined with elite shooting ability--to be effective in the NBA, but I'm not sure he has enough ability to create off the dribble or create for others; he doesn't have crazy shiftiness to his game. I think Brad Beal is his ceiling. Although, he's not quite the athlete that Beal is.

I'd take him 6th or 7th.
 
I recall how curry didn't have enough size, wasn't athletic enough, and couldn't defend and therefore shouldn't be a top 5 pick.

Sounds familiar

Curry is an extreme outlier. It's really just not a good example to use.

Hield's age hurts him. His lack of competition hurts him. Shoot, a guy like Kaminsky was arguable more productive (a lot of that due to age) at a position where his skills make him more of a mismatch, and he's still struggling as a rookie. Again, I like Hield, but he's a role player that could make an impact like Redick IF he continues to improve (and I believe he will). I'd like to see him go against an athletic wing though, so hopefully he plays Syracuse or UNC.
 
Yeah, but these are the same arguments Jimmer apologists were making. For every Lillard/Curry, you can find a dozen Jimmers/Morrisons.

I like Hield, but I don't think he's going to be a star, per se. I think he has good enough length and athleticism--combined with elite shooting ability--to be effective in the NBA, but I'm not sure he has enough ability to create off the dribble or create for others; he doesn't have crazy shiftiness to his game. I think Brad Beal is his ceiling. Although, he's not quite the athlete that Beal is.

I'd take him 6th or 7th.
Jimmer and morrison aint black.
Apples to oranges bro
 
Curry is an extreme outlier. It's really just not a good example to use.

Hield's age hurts him. His lack of competition hurts him. Shoot, a guy like Kaminsky was arguable more productive (a lot of that due to age) at a position where his skills make him more of a mismatch, and he's still struggling as a rookie. Again, I like Hield, but he's a role player that could make an impact like Redick IF he continues to improve (and I believe he will). I'd like to see him go against an athletic wing though, so hopefully he plays Syracuse or UNC.
Kaminsky and reddick? Like white on rice man
 
Post treys shooting numbers and post hields.

Im thinking they dont stack up.

Buddy is a senior; Trey was a sophomore. If we compare sophomore years, Trey's was better.

I'm no Hield hater; I just don't think he's going to take the league by storm or something. Comparing him to Beal is being pretty generous IMO.
 
Buddy is a senior; Trey was a sophomore. If we compare sophomore years, Trey's was better.

I'm no Hield hater; I just don't think he's going to take the league by storm or something. Comparing him to Beal is being pretty generous IMO.
Hield is a baller, trey is a pair of balls
 
Actually, Burke put up about the same numbers as a sophomore Hield, with a higher usage rate. So I guess you are kinda right, they don't stack up.
Compare their best years. Do they stack up?
 
Curry TS% was 60%. Meeks 63%. Reddick 63%. Jimmer 59%. Lillard 63%. CJ McCollum 63%. Morrison 60%. McDermott 64%. As CL pointed out, Hield is at 67%. You just don't find guards scoring 25 ppg and hitting 67% TS - seniors or otherwise.

To assume guys like Burke, if they stayed until senior year, would duplicate what Hield has done, is to ignore history.

He is having a historic season as a shooter/scorer and doing it in one of best conferences in college basketball.
 
Back
Top