What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

Yep. Way better than yours. Hayward has not done all that much for the team in the win loss column. And I know about all the excuses. Doesn't change that fact. Hell, last year we looked great when he was out with injury. I know I know. Sample size. Still doesn't change the fact that we looked great without him.
His stats have not been improving on a year by year basis if you account for minutes. I know I know, his teammates are not good enough for his stats to improve.
He has never been an all star. I know I know, his point guards have not been good enough to help get him there.

Fish, do you understand what point differential is and what it means? Also, the law of averages?

In regards to the Hield-Curry comp, I don't care who made it, it's stupid.
 
Grass is always greener. Let's not look at the facts our core missed over 160 games last year. Let's just trade them all for projects.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Lol. So dumb. I already went over all the excuses.
 
Fish, do you understand what point differential is and what it means? Also, the law of averages?

In regards to the Hield-Curry comp, I don't care who made it, it's stupid.

A. I was the one touting the point differential and how we only had like 9 losses over 10 points all year and all of the losses were against top dog teams when arguing with gvc, frank, and shad.

I think this team is good when healthy cause we have lots of good players. I think if we trade one of them for a top pick, grab another good player In free agency and add pick 12 then I think we are still good when healthy.

B. If you want to pull up currys college stats, size, max vert, cone drills, strengths and weaknesses pre draft and see where he was projected to be picked and then do the same for hield and we find that they are way different from each other then I guess I'm the dick licker.

I'm thinking you would find plenty of similarities though.

I'm not saying he will be as good of an nba player as curry. That's retarded. Curry is arguably the best player in the game and one of the best ever. But to say that their final college seasons stats, size, athleticism, strengths and weaknesses, and draft projections aren't similar is retarded as well.

They do have many similarities coming out of college. Deal with it.
 
A. I was the one touting the point differential and how we only had like 9 losses over 10 points all year and all of the losses were against top dog teams when arguing with gvc, frank, and shad.

I think this team is good when healthy cause we have lots of good players. I think if we trade one of them for a top pick, grab another good player In free agency and add pick 12 then I think we are still good when healthy.

B. If you want to pull up currys college stats, size, max vert, cone drills, strengths and weaknesses pre draft and see where he was projected to be picked and then do the same for hield and we find that they are way different from each other then I guess I'm the dick licker.

I'm thinking you would find plenty of similarities though.

I'm not saying he will be as good of an nba player as curry. That's retarded. Curry is arguably the best player in the game and one of the best ever. But to say that their final college seasons stats, size, athleticism, strengths and weaknesses, and draft projections aren't similar is retarded as well.

They do have many similarities coming out of college. Deal with it.
We should just sign jimmer. Super similar to Curry in college.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top