What's new

Following potential 2012 draftees

Who would we want with the 5th pick? Who would you give up for that?

If you want Hayward as the SG, I would take Barnes. If you want Hayward as a SF, I would take Beal. I would take Robinson/Drummond/MKG in a heart beat if they fell and trade Al and maybe Millsap

I think Lilliard is a stretch here at 5. We need a passing PG for this team
 
Who would we want with the 5th pick? Who would you give up for that?

If you want Hayward as the SG, I would take Barnes. If you want Hayward as a SF, I would take Beal. I would take Robinson/Drummond/MKG in a heart beat if they fell and trade Al and maybe Millsap

I think Lilliard is a stretch here at 5. We need a passing PG for this team

Yes, he is a stretch at 5.
 
Interesting article, can't say that I agree with it at all, but it is interesting.


NBA scout says Kentucky system hides flaws in players

Published June 11, 2012


By LARRY VAUGHT

While Kentucky coach John Calipari has had great success putting players into the NBA draft — and should have six more picked later this month — at least one NBA scout says perception is not always reality.

“The interesting thing, and its not a knock, but there is this Kentucky mystique that Calipari has done a great job creating and perpetuating. The best part about Kentucky’s system is that can hide so many flaws at first glance,” the scout, who asked not to be identified because his team could draft a UK player, said.

Like what?

” MKG (Michael Kidd-Gilchrist)is a good defensive player, but he isn’t as good as people believe. Having (Anthony) Davis camped around the rim allowed players to play defense in a way which minimized their weaknesses,” the scout said.

More?

“The threat of the lob made (Marquis) Teague out to be a better point guard than he really is,” the scout said.

But wait. There’s more.

“In reality, the Kentucky system is smoke and mirrors. I remember being out in Vegas for a Summer League and I was sitting and watching games with a long-time Director of Scouting in the league. He said he was stunned at how unprepared Kentucky players were for the NBA, and he had drafted one of them,” the scout said.
 
PKM's head is gong to explode when he reads that.


Oh, and I agree with all of it. Has there been a Kentucky-Callipari bred All-Star yet? John Wall looks like a lot of hype and isn't really that good. Callipari's only great player thus far is Derrick Rose.
 
If you really like him and think he is good, he isn't a stretch at 5.

Blazers could easily draft him at 6, I think he is safe past Golden State at 7, but he then becomes very draftable by any team there on out.
 
Well, suffice it to say that I disagree with most of that ... and have heard NBA scouts/personnel RAVE that UK players are the best prepared, bar none. Now, it may be fair to say they're also, on average, younger than the players that come out of Duke/UNC, etc .. and that would be fair.

What I do agree with is that there does seem to be a 'Kentucky Effect' and the players are sometimes ranked higher than they would have been from a lesser known program .. just the same as Kansas, UNC, Duke, etc.

As far as Wall .. he hasn't even had a full 2nd year and came in as a one-and-done .. and even with that, who do you take in that draft before him? Turner? No. Williams? No. Cousins? Decent chance .. but that negates the argument.

Yeah .. I'm mad. ;)
 
This just in:

NBA scout says UNC system hides flaws in players


He says tyler zeller is not really that good, its just that with John Henson playing along side him teams couldn't double zeller.

-Every team hides its players weaknesses even the jayhawks, and good teams create situations for players to succede with the skills they have.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top