What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

Diaw isn't worth a top 10 lotto pick. Sorry.

Draft his teammate, Russell Westbrook if you have some sort of UCLA Bruin fetish.

Now I realize I'm clearly not on the same level of brains as you are, but I'm pretty sure you can't draft a current NBA player.

Also, please read my sig. Why are you still here?
 
Now I realize I'm clearly not on the same level of brains as you are, but I'm pretty sure you can't draft a current NBA player.

Also, please read my sig. Why are you still here?

Is that supposed to be some kind of burn? Gee, you got me.

And yes, of course I'm talking about LaVine. Who else on UCLA's roster is even comparable to Westbrook?

Lastly, who says that I'm not cheering for the Thunder today? I know you've been eager to show off your new sign with all your neg reps and messages you've sent to me lately. So yay? Do you feel better now? Was it supposed to be a burn?

As you said, we aren't on the same level of brains. So you need to explain these things to me.
 
Is that supposed to be some kind of burn? Gee, you got me.

And yes, of course I'm talking about LaVine. Who else on UCLA's roster is even comparable to Westbrook?

Lastly, who says that I'm not cheering for the Thunder today? I know you e been eager to show off your new sign with all your neg reps and messages you've sent to me lately. So yay? Do you feel better now?

Lavine is comparable to Westbrook? Cause he can shoot 3's and he's skinny? Sure sounds like Westbrook to me.
 
The boners people get over Lavine are incredible. Really incredible for a dude who has an OK game every now and then.
 
Lavine is comparable to Westbrook? Cause he can shoot 3's and he's skinny? Sure sounds like Westbrook to me.

Um. No.

He's 6 foot 5, a good ball handler, explosive athlete, and plays a lot like Russell Westbrook
 
The boners people get over Lavine are incredible. Really incredible for a dude who has an OK game every now and then.

The boners people get over Gordon for the few highlight dunks he gets every few games are incredible. But the key is potential. Same thing with LaVine, potential. The kid has the physical tools of Westbrook or Rose. If he continues to develop, he will be an incredible player. The holes in his game are just as concerning as the many holes in Gordon's game.

It's foolish to focus on the potential (and ignore the weaknesses) on one while only focusing on the weaknesses (and ignore the potential) of the other.

Why not assume that both Gordon and LaVine will continue to develop?
 
Back
Top